Buying SSD + samsung f3, do i really need to?

Associate
Joined
6 Mar 2011
Posts
29
Hey, just looking for some input on my decision to purchase an SSD and samsung f3's to replace my ageing baraccuda 7200.10's

firstly, i have 3 baraccuda's in raid 0, here is what they're doing at the minute:

http://img269.imageshack.us/i/hdtunev.png/

im just wondering, is it worth buying 2 samsung f3's, or will i be wasting my money? for 180MB/s my pc seems real slow when it comes to the hard drive part of things :( booting into a clean install of windows usually takes ~ 1minute30 to get fully loaded (ie desktop and no slowdown when launching firefox), and performance is poor when multitasking (ie copying a file, i then get some hangups with the mouse and a few seconds lag on windows, surely for 180MB/s thats quite unreasonable?)

i'm just wondering if im having too high expectations here...these drives are a few years old, no errors are reported and benchmarks seem fine with the drives speed, they just feel a lot slower than they used to be,

when i've got all my apps loaded onto windows, a full bootup takes a good 45 seconds longer, and i've seen the speed of some SSD's and they fly when windows boots up and loads about 20 programs in 1-2 seconds flat, however my drives are forever loading a few lightweight apps, and the whole system suffers as a result until everythings done (yes ive defragmented)

i assume this is to do with poor I/O operations per second on normal harddrives, but also game loading times are quite long too, are they not sequential? because if im understanding it correctly, at 180MB/s... i should've loaded about a gig of data in 5 seconds, yet maps for games are taking 30seconds + to load, is this unreasonable or have i missed the point?


anyway, the point is would i notice a big difference in OS speed and loading times if i went with a SSD, and is there any point in "upgrading" my 3 existing drives, to 2 samsung drives, or am i wasting my money
 
I use an SSD for my OS/App's and boot time is fast around the 20sec region, also loading of apps.

I use 1 single Samsung F3 1GB for my data and games, split into 2 partitions.

So id definatly say an SSD would be a good choice, if your sick of the boot/load times, now onto the hard drives u have, once they are released from OS duties, they should be fine with data/games, ok there not the fastest out there.

So getting 2 sammies would give you a further boost in speed of games loading/data transfer, 250MB/s+ when raided. Iv been thinking of doing it myself, but hav'nt bothered yet as i find a single sammy fast enough for my needs.


2sb0514.jpg
 
An ssd will get you reduced boot and loading times, and general usage will be lower latancy. Swapping the hard drives for new hard drives is unlikely to make a noticeable difference.

Your old three disk raid 0 is backed up I hope? Your data really is gone if one of those drives fail
 
As others have mentioned you really will see an improvement in performance if you get a SSD. Your access times are rather high at nearly 14ms with the little splatters on the graph going up to 100 in rare occasions.

Simply going for a 120GB SSD should see you fine for OS and several games & apps. You should see the performance increase straight away ;)
 
Raid 0 two of the HDDs, make a backup drive on the third one, 128GB SSD for OS (15%), most played games (50%), apps (30%), other (5%) - that's what I've got atm.

Move all libraries to the storage drives, simple tweaks will allow to reduce used space on the SSD.

Store music/videos/other games on the HDDs. Documents on the back up drive.
 
+1 Get a ssd for you os
and only get a newer hd for your games if you feel your baraccuda's are to slow
you will really only need one f3, the only advantage to raid 0 will be game loading times are slightly quicker and also transfer rates. so up to you
 
+1 Get a ssd for you os
and only get a newer hd for your games if you feel your baraccuda's are to slow
you will really only need one f3, the only advantage to raid 0 will be game loading times are slightly quicker and also transfer rates. so up to you

I doubt that loading times would be quicker with F3s in RAID 0. Access times are usually marginally higher in RAID setups.
 
Ok perhaps i should change that slightly to marginally. But to the point for games you only really need one good drive and the f3 will do the job.
 
Back
Top Bottom