Poll: DELETED_74993

Were we right to get involved in Libya?

  • Yes

    Votes: 306 50.9%

  • No

    Votes: 295 49.1%
  • Total voters
    601
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't suppose the world would miss Cameron either.

Now if only some foreign power would bomb Britain until Cameron steps down or is killed. Well that's what we're doing in Libya so what's good for the goose...

Yes, this might seem outrageous. Well what we are doing in Libya is absolutely outrageous as well.
 
dirtydog said:
I don't suppose the world would miss Cameron either.

Now if only some foreign power would bomb Britain until Cameron steps down or is killed. Well that's what we're doing in Libya so what's good for the goose...

Yes, this might seem outrageous. Well what we are doing in Libya is absolutely outrageous as well.
Click to expand...
That's so full of logical fallacies I'm backing away from this thread.

I think you should sit down and read the UN resolutions against Libya. And then read those against the UK.
 
Well there aren't going to be many UN resolutions against the UK, when the UK and its partners in crime on the security council have the power to veto them. Even if they didn't have the right of veto, smaller countries are deterred from standing up to the bullies because they know they might be next for sanctions or military attack, if they step out of line.
 
dirtydog said:
Well there aren't going to be many UN resolutions against the UK, when the UK and its partners in crime on the security council have the power to veto them. Even if they didn't have the right of veto, smaller countries are deterred from standing up to the bullies because they know they might be next for sanctions or military attack, if they step out of line.
Click to expand...
That was my point, so an attack on Cameron and his family, or even this country has no international support or basis whatsoever so ***Mo personal attacks***
 
meghatronic said:
That was my point, so an attack on Cameron and his family, or even this country has no international support or basis whatsoever so **snip**.
Click to expand...

If you want to talk about logical fallacies, there is a big one. Just because it would be impossible to get UN resolutions passed which called for action against the US or UK, does not mean that there is no international support for them among people in the world. I mean ordinary citizens, not governments. Governments tend to serve themselves, not their own citizenry.
 
dirtydog said:
If you want to talk about logical fallacies, there is a big one. Just because it would be impossible to get UN resolutions passed which called for action against the US or UK, does not mean that there is no international support for them among people in the world. I mean ordinary citizens, not governments. Governments tend to serve themselves, not their own citizenry.
Click to expand...
ViLHa.jpg
 
OldCoals said:
I am pleased to see the humanitarian aspect of the mission is progressing well.
Click to expand...

Nato said it had hit a "known command-and-control building" in the area, adding it did not "target individuals".

"We regret all loss of life, especially the innocent civilians being harmed as a result of the ongoing conflict," said Lt-Gen Bouchard.
Click to expand...
I guess they think we are stupid.
 
Makes you wonder why no-one has invaded or bombed us , look at all the innocent people (150,000) illegally killed by us in Iraq , but because the UN says its ok, then it must be ok ....
 
meghatronic said:
That's so full of logical fallacies I'm backing away from this thread.

I think you should sit down and read the UN resolutions against Libya. And then read those against the UK.
Click to expand...

i think you should read it not once does it mention regime change.

france/uk/usa wanted a new resolution that aimed for regime change , russia and china wouldnt allow it.

they are obviously trying anyway
 
Ross1234 said:
He might not actually be dead

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/05/20115110482047680.html

He faked his daughters death before. NATO say they haven't targeted individuals only military targets.
Click to expand...

why because the rebels say so? do you actually pay attention to what they say because the majority of it is worse propaganda than gaddafi...

everytime they are losing ground they make up civilians beeing attacked and other rubbish to pressure nato into bombing more targets...
Al Jazeera's Sue Turton, reporting from Benghazi, said there were "an awful lot" of suggestions in Libya that the news of the deaths could be fabricated.

"One of the main spokesmen for the Transitional National Council, Abdul Hafez Goga, is saying he thinks it could all be fabrication, that it may well be Gaddafi is trying to garner some sympathy," she said.
Click to expand...

wait what shes in benghazi and theres a lot of suggestions in "LIBYA" i think tyou mean a lot of suggestions in benghazi love...

random hear say propaganda bs coming from the rebels as usual.

how would the rebels no anymore than anyone else?
 
Calm down Arknor. I said "Might". Just because she said that in Benghazi does not mean it is their only source. You are also failing to comment on the fact Gaddafi has lied about similar circumstances before.
 
OldCoals said:
I am pleased to see the humanitarian aspect of the mission is progressing well.
Click to expand...

LOL! Whoever did this should get a medal (or steam achievement) for triple killing civilians. :thumbsup It was a residential building in a residential area too according to BBC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom