Osama bin Laden is dead - no graphic/violent images.

WeOwnTheSky said:
That's not evidence of him being behind the attack.
Click to expand...

There never has been any. The only evidence is a video of him stating he sanctioned it nothing more and some money links but of course no one in the public can test or inter prate that. He was a figurehead. People like making up history.
 
AcidHell2 said:
There never has been any. The only evidence is a video of him stating he sanctioned it nothing more. He was a figurehead. People like making up history.
Click to expand...

Indeed. That was my point. If they captured him alive with the intention of taking him to trial...well, I would have been very interested to see their 'evidence'.
 
Trial? He would be in guantnmo bay or a Saddam like trial. That would not phase the Americans and they wouldn't need any such evidence. So no they didn't kill him for that reason as it makes no sense.

He is a military combatant no subject to same laws and trials as a civilian. Why do people keep using police and civilian trial standards on this.
 
What's cracking off with this then? They got him and killed him, then dumped the body in the sea without releasing any proof, whether it being photographic or DNA based to the public to confirm his identity?

Right...
 
buchtis said:
What's cracking off with this then? They got him and killed him, then dumped the body in the sea without releasing any proof, whether it being photographic or DNA based to the public to confirm his identity?

Right...
Click to expand...

So you have facial reconigtion software or DNA samples and the equipment to test ?

Even when such info is released it does not proof anything to the public and the arguments and Ct still continue anyway. So there is no point releasing it for those reasons. They are still thinking about releasing them though.
 
I don't think we will know the truth anytime soon so there is little point arguing about it since no one can really prove anything either way. It is most probable that he is dead, I don't think the Americans would announce it publicly unless they were certain about that, but when he actually died is a whole different matter. Or unless of course they have him alive so he can't make any more videos.

I think people should start focusing more on why this was announced now. What was the purpose behind it and what is waiting just around the corner? Sure it will get Obama another 4 years, that's the obvious one but what else could they use this for?

btw the thread title has definately been changed :P
 
GeneralD said:
The Americans did indite him for the bombings of embasys in the late 90s. That is an attack on US soil, the only difference between that and 9/11 is scale.
Click to expand...

And how did they do that, by coming up with the organisation Al Qaeda which meant that the leader of that organisation could be indited.
 
AcidHell2 said:
So you have facial reconigtion software or DNA samples and the equipment to test ?

Even when such info is released it does not proof anything to the public and the arguments and Ct still continue anyway. So there is no point releasing it for those reasons. They are still thinking about releasing them though.
Click to expand...

Who needs facial recognition software? You've got half the planet wanting to know if it really is him they killed. Someone, somewhere, will be looking very closely at such an image. You don't need software to tell you that.
 
http://articles.cnn.com/2004-11-01/world/binladen.tape_1_al-jazeera-qaeda-bin?_s=PM:WORLD

"We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah,"

He said the mujahedeen fighters did the same thing to the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s, "using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers."

"We, alongside the mujahedeen, bled Russia for 10 years until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat,"

He also said al Qaeda has found it "easy for us to provoke and bait this administration."

"All that we have to do is to send two mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without their achieving anything of note other than some benefits for their private corporations,"

"Every dollar of al Qaeda defeated a million dollars, by the permission of Allah, besides the loss of a huge number of jobs," he said. "As for the economic deficit, it has reached record astronomical numbers estimated to total more than a trillion dollars.

And it all shows that the real loser is you," he said. "It is the American people and their economy.

As for President Bush's Iraq policy, Bin Laden said, "the darkness of black gold blurred his vision and insight, and he gave priority to private interests over the public interests of America.

"So the war went ahead, the death toll rose, the American economy bled, and Bush became embroiled in the swamps of Iraq that threaten his future," bin Laden said.
Click to expand...

So how many years will it take us to pay back the money we've spunked on this decade long wild goose chase? wow we killed him but look at the state of our economies.
 
Last edited:
Except for the utterly ridiculous inclusions of Allah for no reason at all (other than he's a religious nutjob and saying its for God makes everything ok) he makes a good point.
 
No pleasing some people.

Even if they release the video of the op, people will cry fake. Doesn't anyone just believe these things can be clean cut?

I can't see why they'd keep him alive or fake this announcement. People gone mad :confused:
 
if and only if they actually killed him then there will be revenge from his followers
but if hes already dead long time ago and they just want to make something special by saying we killed them and his followers knows that hes already dead then nothing going to happen they won't do anything

i actually think he is already dead long time ago
 
arknor said:
big difference between an embassy siege and an attack on the home of a terorist especially when he wasnt armed or a threat to anyone at the time
Click to expand...

Another typical Arknor post attempting to play the devils advocate (read: "Troll"). Posts like this one are ridiculous; are you seriously going to sit on this forum and try and hold some moral high ground as to why the most wanted ******* in the world shouldn't have been hunted down and executed on the spot like the vile scum that he was?

Whether he was armed or not is irrelevant, he got exactly what he deserved. Had this been your average criminal on the street I would whole heartedly agree with your tiresome point but this wasn't your average criminal was it? It was a dangerous and evil maniac. Justice was dealt accordingly.
 
[TW]Fox;19047471 said:
It's amazing isnt it? There could be a story about a guy with an AK47 who raided a local meeting of the fluffy bunny cuddles club and was about to kill 30 puppies and children, but was luckily shot by police, and arknor would be on here posting with no punctuation whatsoever about how terrible it was they shot the guy and how it was all a horrible conspiracy dreamt up by the evil mainstream media. Honestly, he needs more capital letters and full stops and less tinfoil.
Click to expand...

We should have a rating system on this forum. I rate this post ^
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom