am i the only one who finds it ironic the guy is being called subhuman et al. for torturing the poor dog yet people are suggesting the same?
I don't agree, as I think that makes you as bad, and worse than the perpetrator, but I certainly respect your right to hold that opinion. I think many will agree with you, and I do think that punishments are too lenient as they are now, just that's a step too far for me.
Would you happily go through with that, if say, you had to do the shooting or the burying?
+1i hope they catch the ******* who did it and then do the very same thing to him
I was waiting for someone to begin that argument. Which, incidentally, holds no water at all.
That dog in no way deserves what the perpetrator put it through.
For what they did, though, especially being a supposed human being to boot -- well, they sure as **** deserve it.
The argument is valid, though you might disagree with it. Doubtless the people who did this are scum but 'an eye for an eye' would make for a terrible justice system.
In my opinion.
I could happily kill someone that can be that cruel.
+1I could happily kill someone that can be that cruel.
I'm surprised the dog wasn't dead already. No idea how you survive 40 pellets to the head. The people/person who did that should be ashamed, it's very wrong. I don't think we should advocate capital punishment to deal with it though, unlike most here. I love dogs too, and it was totally harmless, but killing someone for it? I'm not sure if that makes you worse than them or not!