Battlefield 3 thread - Server details in opening post -

Status
Not open for further replies.
so have you heard/ seen a spec list? or u just gunna sell overclocked systems :p

understand the marketing but if you dont know the spec it seems quite funny :D

i still say recommended will be quad core and a 460 gtx or ati equivalent .

it will be that or very very close .
 
valkia said:
With a very good guess yes and for the people aching to put their high performance hardware to the test yes. However, if this is incorrect do not suss me out like you did that other guy. You scare me Tefal.
Click to expand...

was only joking.

I got suspended in the crysis system thread for laughing at you calling crysis s2 the hottest game of the year :p
 
Tefal said:
was only joking.

I got suspended in the crysis system thread for laughing at you calling crysis s2 the hottest game of the year :p
Click to expand...

Ahhh, this brings back memories haha. Well true, crysis 2 was good but wasn't the hottest game :) BF3, don't care how much you laugh but i'm sure you've seen the videos ;)
 
Gzero said:
The best way to get someone to drop a ammo box in BC2 today? Press Q on him multiple times, and if he doesn't respond shoot him in the head till he realises what you want (works rather well but takes too long :p).
Click to expand...

How do you shoot someone in the head..if you have no bullets?
 
Evilsod said:
So we've established you're a noob who doesn't believe in teamwork beyond the people he's on mumble with? Good to know. People are capable of working together on public servers you know. Its just kinda hard to do so if you don't even bother putting the proper tools in to assist it.
Click to expand...

come off it.

If you can get 16 or more players to play for the team, rather than as each other, on a public server, the lack of Q menu is going to be no obstacle.
 
MrLOL said:
come off it.

If you can get 16 or more players to play for the team, rather than as each other, on a public server, the lack of Q menu is going to be no obstacle.
Click to expand...

Ah so now the real reason becomes clear.

Whine about putting things in the game that would aid teamwork.
Join a game with a large number of friends all on the same side.
Pubstomp because they can't communicate effectively to counter.
$$$$
Profit
 
PsychoPigeon said:
No one cares about 'commo rose' anymore, it's 2011, we use voice over ip. You just know half the people moaning about it would never use it, they just like to moan.
Click to expand...

This ^!

BF3 will be slightly more derped that BF2 but still great fun. That's my guess. Maybe there will be reality mods or something for the hardcore.
 
Last edited:
I have to agree with Raven here. Commo rose is much better than the magic Q. It tells you who said what on your screen too so I wouldn't have to go round knifing my own team to get ammo or heals, useless retards that they are. I use skype when playing with my friends and we squad up and help each other out but can you imagine everyone using voip, the playerbase is just too immature you would get nothing like the Arma video that jonneymendoza showed earlier.
 
Last edited:
You would never get the entire team participating in VOIP, and even if you did it would be an utter, utter cluster****.

People have been using VOIP since way before BF2 came out - the commo rose was there for a reason!
 
VoIP works well in L4D, I can't see why the same level of teamwork can't be scaled up. The retards that won't use VoIP properly are hardly going to suddenly become a shining example of correct commo rose usage.

That said I did use the commo rose a lot in BF2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom