It's because you have to have the OWNER'S permission to drive on your own insurance. Motability seem to have specifically denied that permission on their cars.
It's because you have to have the OWNER'S permission to drive on your own insurance. Motability seem to have specifically denied that permission on their cars.
I'm a driver on my wifes motability car.
From the RSA motability insurance policy:
Motability said:Other drivers are not allowed. Even if they have fully comprehensive insurance which provides cover to drive other cars, they are not covered to drive your Motability car.
However what I don't understand is why the OP simply didn't give his GF's dad a ride home in his car and then return to pick up the other one in the morning?
Easiest way to deal with things like that imo!
If your partner has DOC on her insurance (taking it for granted shes not covered on her dads insurance) and the car is insured elsewhere im not to sure why they are giving the points out. might be worth taking all documentation for both cars to the police station and showing them how your OH would have been covered at the time
DOC is provided by the insurance company of the OP OH, so if the mobility company say they are not insuring the driver, doesnt mean the OP OH would not of been insured under her own policy, again not having a mobility car i wasnt 100% sure hence why i said it comes down to the T&C
SGWills - you're missing the point. DOC allows you to drive another car third party *with the owner's permission*.
The mobility company do not give this permission == not insured to drive it.
my apologises for making a suggestion/assumption for the OP. Seeing as DOC T&C is determined by the insurance company and each company will have a different T&C for use of DOC, some are really strict as mentioned owner/RK consent,insured elsewhere, not regular use of a particular car etc, others dont have as much conditions, e.g as long as the car is insured elsewhere. As i said mobility cars is not something i take a great deal of time with as they not something i use![]()
indeed as i said they have different T&C but im sure you could deduct that my post did not include all T&Cit was mentioned earlier that if they asked the mobility company they are saying no (which would fall under RK consent) if they ask for owners consent (and before this turns in to the mobility company are classed as the owner aswel blah blah blah) if the father is show as the car owner but the mobility company are the RK, then if her insurance company ask for owners consent, then technically the owner has given consent