Gypsy gang deliberately drowned pony.

Before you go calling bigotry, learn to write correctly, then read what I said again and you will see a related experience tempered with what is generally held as common knowledge. It's unfortunate that some travelling groups have a certain reputation, but there you go. They have it none the less and for good reason. I don't generally go out of my way to cause other people trouble, even for those who I might hold less a than positive opinion of - that goes for everyone and while we all indulge in stereotyping, these stereotypes are based on a certain amount of truth; in this case, one which is backed up (amongst other events) by the large number of drain and man-hole covers removed from a long stretch of the A447, creating a danger to drivers and a substantial cost to the local highways authority to replace the missing covers.
Calling thieving, violent scum, thieving and violent is not bigoted. It's a simple statement of fact. Were there no incidents of stealing and criminal damage and such as I have already described, there would be no need for me to hold any negative preconception (prejudice, if you like) regarding any communities, either diverse or related to 'travellers' as they are regarded in modern parlance.



I'm leicester based myself, but out in the sticks where most of the negative events transpired is hinkley & bosworth/coalville/tamworth area.
Sadly you have to differentiate the good from the bad as it were, leaving generalising prejudice aside. But what can you do? There's a long and respected tradition of itinerant and semi-nomadic peoples throughout europe (some of these rent fields for their ponies from the locals with little or no trouble, to add a little balance to all this), but then there's also the aforementioned scum. I've met both. But I don't mean to lecture you on this, I'm just thinking aloud :o
Some of this reminds me of the two lurcher dogs hung from bridge **graphic image link** I remember at the time there was a lot of local speculation that it was ****** who were responsible, also that it was just some local yobs, or even farmers who may have been responsible. I can't say who is, but it reminded me of the sort of local disgust for the incident that parallels some of the talk here.



:p
Often the opposite end of the daily fail thinking is just as blinkered... it's why I picked at his retort in the way I did above because he only read what he wanted to read in what I said, at least I acknowledged my generalisation raised by this incident with the ponies could be wrong, amongst other things - that's the irony of stereotyping for you :D we all do it, justified or not.

if you read all my posts, you will see that i left school at 12, so i know i am not that well educated, but hey i try. ;)
i will admit that there are good and bad in everybody or group of people.
there are bad lots of travellers who give a bad name to everyone else.
but you seem to think they are all the same.
Also is there any proof that it was gypsys that took these manhole covers?
as with the price of metals these days, any one could be tempted to steal them, or is that you sterotyping again,
'Hey the manholes have been stolen, then it must be the local gypsys'

Talking about sterotyping, i once had my car stolen, and i actually found out who stole it. it was a young asian chap, and when i finally spoke to him about it, he just said it was nothing personal, it was just for fun.
I did not then go around saying that all asians are thieving scum, as obviously that would be wrong, but if it was a gypsy, then that would obviously allowed. :rolleyes:
You go to any rough estate, and the crime commited there by young English or otherwise men, is way way worse than a few isolated but widely reported crimes by gypsys.
Even just go to any town centre at midnight and you will see, fighting, anti social behaviour, urinating, defacting etc... all usual gypsy behaviour, but commited by 'normal' people.
But what is ever done over this? Nothing.
You are right, we all have built in sterotypes/intolerances, and clearly we now know yours.
i know i am not very eloquent, and therefore not as good at getting my point across as you, so in any verbal debate, you will always come across as better, but that is my cross to bear.
At the end of the day, calling for a race of people to be exterminated/wiped off the face of the earth, is tooo much.
We could argue for ever, the gypsy issue, but some of the comments in this thread were way to harsh.
As i said with Robbo, we will just have to agree to disagree,
so, have a good day, no hard feelings. :)
 
I like the fact that those PEOPLE who saw them pushing the pony in and NOT doing ANYTHING about it. those people are just as bad as the people killing the Pony.

WEAK people.
 
I like the fact that those PEOPLE who saw them pushing the pony in and NOT doing ANYTHING about it. those people are just as bad as the people killing the Pony.

WEAK people.

I like the fact you read a Daily Mail story which isn't reported anywhere else and took it as gospel - tut tut.
 
I would say one thing, to what's left of the original traveling communities horses and ponies are vital, and if they lose one it's increadibly expensive for them to replace it outwith the community. I'm not sure the travelers in motorhomes are quite the same thing, but I've probably went and outraged someone there. There are different types of gypsies. Although they do all claim the same sort of heritage.

And it is the mail, but I didn't read beyond the pictures anyway :(
 
Is what UncleRuckus said about the fighting dogs true, or rather do they have fighting dogs at all?

Some Gypsies somewhere will have fighting dogs but so will some British people.
Don't expect to walk into a Gypsy camp and see fighting dogs everywhere just like you wouldn't walk into a Muslim area and see bombs strapped to everybody.
 
Some Gypsies somewhere will have fighting dogs but so will some British people.
Don't expect to walk into a Gypsy camp and see fighting dogs everywhere just like you wouldn't walk into a Muslim area and see bombs strapped to everybody.

Yeah I realise a lot of people are aren't labelled as a group do it just wondering if it is common among gypsies.
Awful what they do to the dogs to make them so wicked, people who do that need put down along with the dogs.
(not suggesting that is mainly gypsies before I'm called a racist.)
 
Some Gypsies somewhere will have fighting dogs but so will some British people.
Don't expect to walk into a Gypsy camp and see fighting dogs everywhere just like you wouldn't walk into a Muslim area and see bombs strapped to everybody.

lol

not met one gypsy with one fighting dog this is the problem.

they are so typecast that there screwed no matter if they good .

the horses are kept for leisure (trotting) and to sell on . it makes no sense to harm your money or future sale.

they invest a lot of there cash in horses
 
if you read all my posts, you will see that i left school at 12, so i know i am not that well educated, but hey i try. ;)
i will admit that there are good and bad in everybody or group of people.
there are bad lots of travellers who give a bad name to everyone else.
but you seem to think they are all the same.
Also is there any proof that it was gypsys that took these manhole covers?
as with the price of metals these days, any one could be tempted to steal them, or is that you sterotyping again,
'Hey the manholes have been stolen, then it must be the local gypsys'

Talking about sterotyping, i once had my car stolen, and i actually found out who stole it. it was a young asian chap, and when i finally spoke to him about it, he just said it was nothing personal, it was just for fun.
I did not then go around saying that all asians are thieving scum, as obviously that would be wrong, but if it was a gypsy, then that would obviously allowed. :rolleyes:
You go to any rough estate, and the crime commited there by young English or otherwise men, is way way worse than a few isolated but widely reported crimes by gypsys.
Even just go to any town centre at midnight and you will see, fighting, anti social behaviour, urinating, defacting etc... all usual gypsy behaviour, but commited by 'normal' people.
But what is ever done over this? Nothing.
You are right, we all have built in sterotypes/intolerances, and clearly we now know yours.
i know i am not very eloquent, and therefore not as good at getting my point across as you, so in any verbal debate, you will always come across as better, but that is my cross to bear.
At the end of the day, calling for a race of people to be exterminated/wiped off the face of the earth, is tooo much.
We could argue for ever, the gypsy issue, but some of the comments in this thread were way to harsh.
As i said with Robbo, we will just have to agree to disagree,
so, have a good day, no hard feelings. :)

I'm sorry, I didn't read all of your posts you speak of, just the reply to mine.
Don't do yourself down fella, I was just responding to the bigot thing - as I said it's not bigotry to confirm facts of what happens in the area local to where I grew up.
I don't think 'they' are all the same. I said this clearly in both of my posts.
You make a valid point regarding the bad behaviour of others - this is true, but we were talking about ******. For me there's a distinction between ****** and gypsies, as there's a difference between people who live on rough council estates and scum who live on rough council estates, but I digress.
But you seem not to want to acknowledge this and see fit to regard my distinction as stereotyping/intolerance/prejudice against all travellers. Perhaps I express myself in a different way, and that is no better or worse in its motivation than yours, despite my little dig at you, perhaps unfairly given the tone of your more recent response... you know how it sometimes is ;)

However, I think you might be confusing me with another poster. At no point in this topic did I claim or support a 'race of people to be exterminated/wiped off the face of the earth'. I said I have no time for ******. That's a country mile away from what you infer above. I also said that, when it comes to an issue of rights, those who have no respect for others and their property deserve none; this goes for everyone, not just ****** - it's like asking for charity when you actively take what is not yours, it's an affront to those you demand rights or respect from. These rights have to be earned, not dished out wholesale, otherwise they are worth nothing. Certainly this applies in the case of ****** behaving in a way that is unacceptable for the local community, yet demanding that they have rights to permanent sites to stay at and access to all of the local amenities to which they contribute nothing.

It is entirely understandable that some people see this as a threat to their community that must be fought off. For myself, I'd be quite happy for travellers to live where they choose, if the associated trouble they bring with them ceased - I believe this means and end to the lifestyle of travelling from place to place, however... the loss of certain traditional behaviour in favour of joining the majority of people in this country who have normal jobs and pay taxes. That's little enough for me to loose (as I'm already part of that majority), but more difficult a choice, maybe an unacceptable choice, for those who choose to not settle down in one place.
Perhaps that's where so much of the trouble comes from trying to live outside the majority, inevitably there will be friction, deservedly or otherwise.

I acknowledge my own stereotyping, but that is not without hard foundation. I think my position is fair - ****** have a reputation that is well deserved, if somewhat unavoidable at times - that does not make me wrong in my view of them. I don't go blaming them for bad weather or whatever out of hand. As far as the much discussed manhole covers... well it's the local ****** who run the scrap metal thing, and yes they take what does not belong to them. The logic of the situation here is that they are the most likely candidates for the theft - I already mentioned that it's unfortunate, for a good number of reasons, that the ****** are the first to have suspicion fall upon them, but the fact is said suspicion is bang on the money most all of the time.
It would certainly be prejudicial for me to accuse/blame the ****** of stealing, when they had never indulged in the sort of theft I have already talked about, but it is their actions that make others view them in the way that they do. Sometimes this is not fair, but neither is setting fire to buildings because you get into a scrape with a local farmer who has you down, rightly, for pinching his stuff.

Anyways, you seem a polite enough chap, so accept my apology for the dig at you, I could have chosen not to speak as I did. :o
 
lol

not met one gypsy with one fighting dog this is the problem.

they are so typecast that there screwed no matter if they good .

the horses are kept for leisure (trotting) and to sell on . it makes no sense to harm your money or future sale.

they invest a lot of there cash in horses

I also pointed that out too but we're on a loser with so much racism.
 
Back
Top Bottom