Are you Homophobic?

Status
Not open for further replies.
In the beginning there was only Adam...

Are you suggesting he knocked a couple out before Eve appeared :D

I think most people don't like it all that much but just tolerate it because they're decent people. That's a fine view to hold in my view, why should you have to like it? As long as you keep it to yourself, there's no problem.

I completely agree with your rational. I have no hate towards gays but i wont tolerate political correctness. If you don't agree with it and have no prejudice towards them you aren't a homophobe. Don't be affraid to speak your mind :cool:
 
We have homosexuals to thank for buttsechs innit ;) Ok so not with another bloke but still... ;)

On a serious note, I don't "get" it - because well, I'm heterosexual. I tolerate it, and as long as it's not shoved in my face then I'm happily ignorant. Heck, even a straight couple going "at it" excessively in inappropriate situations can be unpleasant too.

However the whole fuss about using the word "gay" as an insult or meaning crap or whatever is ridiculous. It's just a word. People need to learn to be offended less easily.

Anyway, I take the mick out of myself (as do my friends) for being a bit camp and heck, I've been called "gay" more than enough times - I think I can get over it! :p
 
killing people is normal ! after all, animals do it..

(gay logic)

Killing is normal, we kill animals for food all the time, there are currently 31 ongoing military conflicts. We're the most efficient killers that have ever existed.

But as pointed out earlier the normalcy of something has no relevance to it being right or wrong.

What you're calling gay logic is just plain ol' logic, something you seem to be severely lacking.
 
And you would be right. In fact some on this forum of ours have accused me of being a homophobe.:eek:

you are, if you wernt you wouldnt take offence to be called gay
You might want to think that argument through. I quite like girls/turnips/cars/computers/pounds coins* and yet would still take offence to being called one...

:p


*delete as appropriate or insert silly comparison of your choice here.
 
Sexual preference is ones own business and should not be dictated by anyone, other than their own conscience. That said I don't believe homosexuality should be openly promoted. Accepted maybe, but actively promoted? Certainly not. If nothing else for the long term greater good and survival of the human race.

There are far too many people on this planet as it is, if say 50% of people turned gay AND stopped breeding it would probably be a good thing.
 
Dunno if I'm homophobic

[...]

**PC BRigade look away now**'Mincers' however, should be shot on sight. The likes of Alan Carr and especially Louis Spence really do get my back up with the way they promote their sexual preference through innappropriate innuendos and all round camp approach.

I agree entirely with this post.

I don't care what people do with their willies and I generally don't want to know. I neither like nor dislike gay people due to their sexuality, but I do find the thought of two men having sex pretty repulsive. This doesn't prevent me from being good friends with a few gay people, and they know exactly where I stand.
 
Right, you're a peadoephile.

you can't be annoyed or offended by that remark otherwise it means you are one.

errr no.

i suggest you re read what he wrote and look up the difference between homosexual and homophobe it's a small quite quite a key difference.
 
Killing is normal, we kill animals for food all the time, there are currently 31 ongoing military conflicts. We're the most efficient killers that have ever existed.

But as pointed out earlier the normalcy of something has no relevance to it being right or wrong.

What you're calling gay logic is just plain ol' logic, something you seem to be severely lacking.

i quoted "killing someone in a home" not killing animals or war, which is totally different, im talking about murder, which animals do, and on that logic, gay people use. which is just stupid
 
Dunno if I'm homophobic, I guess I am? Tbh I don't really care for the term homophobic or the manner in which society seems intent on labelling people. I find it laughable many people are afraid to speak their mind for fear of being called 'homophobe' or some other meaningless label.

I cringe when people say 'I'm hetrosexual/straight but...' like they are trying to make things clear they are not gay as if it's a disease but then go on to a hypocritical tirade while trying to mask their homophobic tendancies. I also laugh when gay people refer to hetrosexuals as 'straight' but then get upset when you refer to them as 'bent'. Like I said labels are perhaps not a good thing ;).

Personally, I find sex between one man and another man repulsive. Just the thought of it turns my stomach and in my view is just as morally wrong/unatural as having sex with an animal from a different species. Even men kissing is repugnant to me. Much the same as my feelings will be repugnant to others. Sadly, we cannot help the way we feel and that works both ways, its how we act on these feelings that makes us socially acceptable and the people we are.

I do not get angered by the idea of homosexuality and would certainly never assualt, abuse or discrimate against someone simply because of their sexual preference. Indeed, I have had many interesting debate with homosexual friends (yes you can be friends with people whose sexual preference you do not hold dear to your own!). The age old 'but if it were two women' often gets asked. My answer to this is simply 'of course I find this attractive, I'm a man and having two sexually attractive women arroused taps into a mans natural instict to spread his seed with as many females as possible. The chance to impregante two women at once is obviously an attractive proposition to my 'natural' instincts, the fact they wouldn't be interested in me does not compute with my neanderthal insticts.

Sexual preference is ones own business and should not be dictated by anyone, other than their own conscience. That said I don't believe homosexuality should be openly promoted. Accepted maybe, but actively promoted? Certainly not. If nothing else for the long term greater good and survival of the human race.

**PC BRigade look away now**'Mincers' however, should be shot on sight. The likes of Alan Carr and especially Louis Spence really do get my back up with the way they promote their sexual preference through innappropriate innuendos and all round camp approach.

I think if a lot of people are honest they'd possibly agree with you post.
 
you are, if you wernt you wouldnt take offence to be called gay

You assume I took offence to being called gay. I didn't, I simply thought it strange that you assume those that do not share your viewpoint must be homosexual when clearly that is not the case.

Merely pointing out that I wasn't of the homosexual persuasion doesn't constitute any offence taken or any homophobic tendencies on my part.
 
Has anyone mentioned bodybuilders yet?

(:D:D)

Yes... you :p

Must admit there is a lot of mutual appreciation between the bodybuilding fraternity, but then again can one admire the work achieved by someone without feeling sexually aroused? I know I can. :)

Bunch of gays the lot of 'em.

Too right - I love it when they scream loudly in the gym too (makes the mind wander...), makes me quiver with excitement.
 
killing people is normal ! after all, animals do it..

(gay logic)

There is nothing inherently abnormal about killing someone, it is in many instances morally and legally wrong but in others it is both acceptable and for the greater good.

You cannot make such sweeping judgements against such wide ranging subject matter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom