I'm not overly impressed with 3d
Would that not just mean that when you see a 3D movie you just can't tell "how far away" something is?
Surely having only 1 eye makes no difference? Doesn't having just one eye mean you have no depth perception?
Would that not just mean that when you see a 3D movie you just can't tell "how far away" something is?
I suppose he could sit there with his one good eye and his stereoscopic polarising glasses on... But that would seem a little bit absurd.
If his friends want to see it in 3d.
Wearing glasses would only one eye would see it in 2d. But how much detail would be lost, how about darkness as 3rd fairly dark anyway.
Would it? Each eye sees the same level of brightness, close one of your eyes now and your perception with just one eye isn't any dimmer.Aye, it would be darker.
Would it? Each eye sees the same level of brightness, close one of your eyes now and your perception with just one eye isn't any dimmer.
I believe that 3D films work on stereography, so you'll see the screen as two images superimposed and illegible. Wear the specs though, as already mentioned further up and you'll see it as a single image. Colours may be limited though depending on what colour the specs lenses are.
If someone with no vision in one eye "can not tell how far away something is" surely they are seeing in 2D, making the 3D part of the movie pointless to them.
Yeah, that's why it's dimmer with the glasses on than off, but I don't see why it would be dimmer with just one eye with the glasses on than with two eyes with the glasses on.you are only receiving one of the two images as the glasses filters out the other, so that's part of the detail and light level?
Yeah, that's why it's dimmer with the glasses on than off, but I don't see why it would be dimmer with just one eye with the glasses on than with two eyes with the glasses on.
Joke is very poor taste helmet![]()
IMAX is still awesome. 3D is not.