[TW]Fox;19783118 said:Specials have full police powers.
They'll be doing logistic support for the regulars i'd imagine
[TW]Fox;19783118 said:Specials have full police powers.
[TW]Fox;19783118 said:Specials have full police powers.
All Met Specials have been asked to come in for duty and employers are being requested to release them from their day job apparently.
And their parents, who undeniably have the vastly greater influence on their upbringing and behaviour and clearly did a bloody terrible job, were brought up and educated in the Thatcher 'me first' years. Fun this isn't it![]()
Does insurance cover riots?
Nigel Farage Leader, UKIP on Twitter calls for the government to send in the Army: "Cobra must call in military support for the police if they are to control these riots. The population deserve protection."
Turned on the news this morning to hear Theresa May saying we need "consensual policing" to solve the current riots. She wants local residents to grass on the trouble makers and officers trawling CCTV for mugshots.
Do we hell. To me it seems these rioters are nothing but opportunists operating in the power vacuum caused by too lenient responses to the current riots.
Send the Police in with tear gas, water cannon and batons rounds and I bet this whole mess will be resolved in a couple of days bar liberals complaining we are crushing the rights of looters and vandals.
We know most of the arrested will be back on the streets in a couple of days with nothing but a slap on the wrist. A lung full of tear gas or baton round may be the only justice we can ever place on them.
I do find this whole situation very troubling as the very measures I call for would more easily be employed in the future if wheeled out now. Those situations may actually warrant mass protests (albeit without the vandalism and looting). Thinking future directions of the current financial crisis.
One problem with the police going in hard, I can guarantee you that there will be a lot of 'civilian' casualties. Unfortunately as these things break out 'innocent' people are coming out to spectate or to purely get out of the area. Furthermore, there are scenes where yobs have very young children amongst them. Any death/injury of a young child will evoke a far greater 'community' response.
It's v easy for all of us to be perched on our nests looking down & give instructions such as army/water canons, tear gas etc. In all honest I think this too but at the 'ground' level this isn't going to work. The only 'safe' solution is a curfew but as we saw yesterday, trouble started at 4pm so brining in a curfew at 9pm may already be too late.
I take the specials are the "plastic police" that can't do a thing and get loled at?
Are there enough police to overwhelm the rioters or do we need soldiers to make up numbers if nothing else?
Why do you get a crowd of bystanders all filming on their mobiles some yob break a car window. Why not try and stop it? Just an observation.
Do you actually imagine that adding more violent to the situation will help it resolve?
Thought so. Tragic if business and homeowners lose everything because of these riots.
Quite the opposite - they should be paid and handsomely too rather than this and previous governments cutting pay and positions eft, right and center and then relying on people to come in for free to make up the difference.I can't work out if that is a mocking comment - but if it is i'd suggest you wind your neck in. They will be going out there FOR FREE and getting beaten, having bricks and petrol bombs thrown at them and putting themselves in mortal danger.
PM to make speech at 10:30
Let's see what he's made of now!
Because there is a likelyhood that if the police later showed up, the yob would claim that the bystanders 'attacked' him, and thus the bystanders would be arrested for assaulting the poor defenceless hoody, who would then sue for compensation..