Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 4,498
I wondered if you still held this view on seeing the pictures this week of the Apollo 17 landing site released by NASA?
They were shopped. Can't you tell from the pixels?
I wondered if you still held this view on seeing the pictures this week of the Apollo 17 landing site released by NASA?
It's a heck of a lot less than half.
They were shopped. Can't you tell from the pixels?

I suppose this is proof though that even when presented with complete evidence, conspiracy theorists will still not accept the truth, being far happier cosied up under their tinfoil hats.
)one thing i don't get it goren says you need constant thrust.
so that means that the theory that the reflectors for measuring the distance were done by robots (rather than people) doesn't work either as we've never launched such a large rocket in history
so why are lasers aimed at those reflectors reflected back along their original path?

I am not paranoid. I understand people like the idea that man has been to the moon. Makes them feel good. Can't convince someone who is emotional like that.
I should know, I have seen a few photoshops in my time.
I suppose this is proof though that even when presented with complete evidence, conspiracy theorists will still not accept the truth, being far happier cosied up under their tinfoil hats.
Pretty sad really.
I am not paranoid. I understand people like the idea that man has been to the moon. Makes them feel good. Can't convince someone who is emotional like that.
I am not paranoid. I understand people like the idea that man has been to the moon. Makes them feel good. Can't convince someone who is emotional like that.

well if you needed constant thrust in space the earth should have fallen into the sun by now.
why hasn't it?
To be fair, the hot air that conspiracy theorists spout probably is enough to power the earth ...
We don't think you're paranoid Groen.
We know your a moron.