Time travel.. if its possible why havent we seen it.

There is a Charlie Chaplin DVD that strangely shows what looks like someon with a mobile phone in movie. Very bizarre.

I suspect it is possible to go back in time which might explain some of the UFO activity. It also might explain why certain old structures were built.

IIRC that was a hearing aid.
 
There is a Charlie Chaplin DVD that strangely shows what looks like someon with a mobile phone in movie. Very bizarre.

I suspect it is possible to go back in time which might explain some of the UFO activity. It also might explain why certain old structures were built.
Here it is. In the comments people metion you can see the top of the phone.

Also there is the Philidelphia Experiment, most people have heard of though I never heard this story before.

The second test occured .I came aboard with my brother. working also on the experiment, i was not yet named al bielek ,-are you ready?- i was born the august 4th 1916,my brother in may 1917,our father was alexander duncan cameron senior,who was also a marine.We were both inside the control office protected by a steel armor plating, the doors also were in steel armor. Everything has been normal for a few 30 seconds when electronic tubes started to explode one after the other,like in waves. They were 3000 used to control the coils used to generate the electro magnetic field. Some tried to stopp the system then but it was too late. It seemed to become so dangerous inside the room that some of us decided to get out. We run out. The crew was already worried about the situation, but none was yet "melted with steel".We both then had what has maybe been a good idea, we jumped out of the ship("reconstitution" image on the movie), we did not fall into the water, we went trough a strange phenomen, which looked like a tunnel or some sort of, with some lightnings inside. From what we both estimated ,it took around 2 minutes, we landed then; So not in the water but on the ground, and it was night. we felt like we were on a military area, and we were. Some troups found us and brought us to a building ,we took an elevator and started to go down several levels so that we understood it was underground.-how many still ON?-When the doors opened we have been welcome by a civilian, the man told us;_you re very welcome, i was waiting for you, i am the professor von neumann.
we later realized we both were living then in 1983.I answered _you cannot be john von neumann i left him less than an hour ago and he is much younger than you. _this is not the year 1943 but 1983 ,and i am the same man 40 years older.
we were there since 12hours, when he came and said this to us ;_we have to send you now back to the ship (eldridge),when i asked him how he could do it he told me:_we totaly master this space-time system here, at the montauk project, you will be sent back so that you stop the device on the ship,it will bring the eldridge to philadelphia. Later this is what happened, we were on the boat, found the equipment and destroyed it, everything started to calm down at this moment. We went out of the control room to the main area on the bridge,it s there that we saw 2 men "mixed "with the bridge of steel,(sorry for translation if incorrect),and 2 others with the armor-plating, a fifth one we saw had the hand prisoner of the metal too.I walked over one whose arms and face were coming out of the same steel.My brother saw all those persons prisoners ,he looked at me, like saying to me "come with me"
 
Erm how do you think a mobile phone worked back then exactly?

Funny you should say that. A very clever man called Kip Thorne and his graduate student come up with a similar idea.



It would require an insane amount of energy to actually keep wormholes open to get stuff through. The amount of radiation would be stupid. It's basically natures way of saying "no, not happening". Interesting stuff though :)

Yeah the idea of a time machine only allowing you to go back to the point it was created isn't a new theory but it indeed an interesting one.

Not just wormholes either though, the same would apply to any machine created here on earth if we had enough energy to run it and keep it running!
 
Last edited:
It must be impossible at all times, otherwise (assuming that we have a future so vast that it might as well be infinite) we would have proof in someone/something coming back to our time from that future.

on your theory regarding a future so vast, surely the 2000 odd years of noticeable existence is nothing in the true scale of time and they probably haven't been back to such time. In reality though i would like to believe it was possible but at best we are going to be able to travel forward and this will only be marginally.
 
on your theory regarding a future so vast, surely the 2000 odd years of noticeable existence is nothing in the true scale of time and they probably haven't been back to such time. In reality though i would like to believe it was possible but at best we are going to be able to travel forward and this will only be marginally.

No that doesn't work. If the future is infinite (and if you bring multiple time lines into things, that makes it so), then everything that can ever happen will happen at some point. This includes someone coming back to this time, exactly this time. And one minute from now, tomorrow, a week from now etc... infinite time means infinite possibilities, and the fact that there's only a tiny chance that they'd come back to this point in time becomes a moot point, every time would be visited purely by running through every single option. The old saying of "If you sit a million monkeys in front of type writers for eternity, one will eventually write a masterpiece" comes to mind. The point that even that saying misses however, is that if even one monkey is writing for eternity, he will write everything there ever could be written, of unimaginable complexity and infinite length.

Infinite is a strange thing.

:Edit: The forum broke for a minute just after I posted this. This thread is too much for the poor hamster to get his head around :p
 
Erm how do you think a mobile phone worked back then?

Erm, good point. Hang on I never said it was real.
Communicators use subspace transmissions that do not conform to normal rules of physics in that signals can bypass EM interference, and the devices allow nearly instantaneous communication at distances that would otherwise require more time to traverse.:D

I can't believe I just tried reading that.
Sorry it was copied and pasted from some French journalist's (Jimmy Guieu. Yes he was a science fiction novelist. Apparently he stirred a lot of stuff and hornets nests and was assassinated.) investigational research; not very well translated.
I hadn't heard of the time travelling forward bit to 1983 before, or if I had I forgot. :D
Found the "We totally master this space time system here." statement kind of; je ne sais quoi.
 
Last edited:
The maths seems to indicate that time can move in either direction, hence all the theories of time travel , but isn't it entropy that stops what we would classically understand as travelling back in time.
 
Perhaps you can't go back to a date before the time machine was invented and constructed. Otherwise, how would you transfer into it at the other end?
 
It must be impossible at all times, otherwise (assuming that we have a future so vast that it might as well be infinite) we would have proof in someone/something coming back to our time from that future.

Temporal prime directive bro, they may have been here but we wouldnt know!
 
Perhaps all UFO sightings are actually time travellers. That would explain why they are so keen not to be spotted.
 
Everyone seems to be assuming that the future is happening at the same time as the present and that the past keeps repeating itself, as if to say our next moves have already been planned out for us and our previous moves have been carved into stone, if time isn't set in this linear fashion then of course we wouldn't have seen anyone come back in time from the future, and there would be no future to go foward to as it doesn't exist yet.....making time travel impossible.

Does that make sense? :p

Would you recommend usiong a bus or a time machine? :p

In this adventure the bus is your time machine :D
 
Time travel has been experienced many times in fast moving objects using ultra precise atomic clocks. Such experiments have taken place on airplanes and in satalites used for GPS and other functions for studying the earth such as weather.

They found that everything that went faster showed it's clock was progressing slowly, with two of the same model of satalite one was travelling at about 25,000mph and the other closer to 19,000mph. They contained the exact same clock and both clocks were verified as working perfectly and in sync, yet the clock on the 25,000mph satalite was experiencing the atoms revolving ever so slightly slower. Which was consistent with the earlier tests where atomic clocks were put onto airplanes and it confirmed the maths.

Those fast objects were in fact slightly out of sync in time itself, it was later confirmed that every time you walk you too will affect your standing in time. The effect of time slowing down for moving objects works to the one very instant of time (about 18 billion, billion, billion, billion, billion billionths of a second. The smallest unit of forward moving time possible) in relation to moving a distance of one hydrogen atom.

You cannot escape time travel and you do experience it to an extremely minor degree every second you breath, because the Earth moves around the Sun and the Sun moves around in the Glalaxy and the Galaxy moves around in the Universe.

With the speed of expansion of our Universe it was postulated that our Galaxy could be experiencing one second for every year that passes in a new galaxy at the center of universe. And likewise every year here in the Milkway could be one second in the oldest galaxy's at the furthest edges of the visible Universe. Simply because the further away from the center you go the faster objects move away.
 
Back
Top Bottom