• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Bulldozer Finally!

Video review of the 8150. It's in Turkish though.

http://www.donanimhaber.com/islemci...ekirdekli-FX8150-islemcisi-video-inceleme.htm

2600k doesn't half beat it.

Cinebench scores from that video:

1100T = 5.82
2600K = 6.71
FX8150 = 5.98

I'm struggling to see the selling point for BD, it's going to be a dog compared to other CPU's in anything that doesn't absolutely max out all of the threads, hell an X6 at 4ghz is probably going to be a better all-around chip let alone an overclocked 2600K.
 
I guess this is why those guys sounded really unenthusiatic when confirming the FX Asian release date in that interview. It's also probably why neither of them chose FX as the product they were most excited about.
 
Intel's do a lot better in IBT/LinX than AMD, but for reference a Phenom X4 at 4.2ghz gets around 55gflops and an X6 at 4ghz around 75gflops iirc.

Not really.

The only reason I get so much is AVX.

the 8150 gaming results look slightly better than the 1100t

That's worth slamming 220 quid on, not :p.

I've a theory that the CPU is getting crippled by its own design depending on how loaded the CPU is. Explains why it's faster in games as opposed 100% loading benchmarks.
 
There's obviously a problem, it's the fact there is a problem this late in the game that's worrying.

Can someone with 6 cores "bandwidth starve" their CPU, and run dual channel then single?
See what difference it makes.

I pulled the 2 far sticks that i could get too, but my mobo ram slot config means that its still dual channel.
 
Back
Top Bottom