• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Bulldozer Finally!

CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
The following chart was posted on XS.

3dsmax.jpg


It seems to be from this review site:

http://www.ozeros.com/2011/10/labs-¡amd-fx-en-ozeros/

It looks like the top three charts are for the FX CPUs.

The Core i7 charts which are blurred have a three in them?? :confused:
Click to expand...

Was that the original file name?
 
Remember, we also need to compare the performance level (with 2500K/2600K), when overclocked. This is very important as any enthusiast who is going to buy a sandybridge intel cpu is going overclock it. The sandybridge cpus overclock like demons. The question shall be if AMD can also overclock.
 
sunama said:
Remember, we also need to compare the performance level (with 2500K/2600K), when overclocked. This is very important as any enthusiast who is going to buy a sandybridge intel cpu is going overclock it. The sandybridge cpus overclock like demons. The question shall be if AMD can also overclock.
Click to expand...

BD can overclock the same amount.
 
Martini1991 said:
Helpful :p
EDIT : AMD in my experience have always been good at 3DSMax rendering. my 965 at 4GHZ could outpace a 4GHZ Q9550 (I think, it was the same or something)
Click to expand...

lol, more spin from you.

AMD has always been good in one single thing where it beat a Q9550, so beating a Sandybridge in it means nothing?

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2819/4

The 965be is squarely ahead of the Q9550, in what 9/10 tests in that review the 965BE beats the Q9550, but your position on a benchmark that doesn't look favourably, is to pretend its the one benchmark where AMD does well in.


Q9550/Q9xxx aren't as good as Phenoms, flat out, not surprising due to when each is/was available. Core i3-i7's pretty much spank Phenom's, Intel's older architecture doesn't spank phenoms.

Even ignoring all that, Bulldozer is so vastly removed from Phenom 2 architecture, it literally doesn't matter anyway, what AMD was good in before, if this was based off Phenom 2, AMD would most likely still be good in vs Intel, + any improvements made so might be stronger elsewhere. being an entirely different architecture, Bulldozer could be strong everywhere P2 was weak, and crap everywhere the P2 was strong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom