I didn't get charged extra as I didn't bother putting on special tyres for the fortnight of snow we had.
I think popular opinion is that all should be changed as the back might over take the front on a FWD car, that would only occur in heavy snow/ice though I'd imagine.
Not really, having less grip at the rear makes the car more vulnerable to lift off oversteer. All 4 tyres should be changed if you go for winter tyres.
Part winter tyres is like partial circumcision, either go the whole way or forget it![]()
I can't honestly see the point in winter tyres where I live. They just aren't needed. Plus, by fitting them, you remove all possibility of using "I couldn't get the car out of the drive" as an excuse. Having said that, learning how to control a car, it's speed and direction is far more valuable than fitting winter tyres. I had no issues whatsoever last year and that included getting up an incline which most FWD cars seemed to fail at.
The "auto creep" is a godsend in snow and ice![]()
Winter tyres out perform normal tyres from mid November to mid March, hence them being winter tyres not snow tyres.
Yeah except one of the first decent tests we've seen (Evo this month) that included a good named summer tyre, showed that actually, that's not necessarily true at all.
There is/are load more information out there saying the compete oppersite.
Yeah except one of the first decent tests we've seen (Evo this month) that included a good named summer tyre, showed that actually, that's not necessarily true at all.
I can't honestly see the point in winter tyres over here. They just aren't needed. Plus, by fitting them, you remove all possibility of using "I couldn't get the car out of the drive" as an excuse. Having said that, learning how to control a car, it's speed and direction is far more valuable than fitting winter tyres. I had no issues whatsoever last year and that included getting up an incline which most FWD cars seemed to fail at.
The "auto creep" is a godsend in snow and ice![]()
If you say so
It did, it showed that one of the best tyres in its class was only any good in dry/wet conditions and sucked badly at low temps and on ice and snow. Even Nan Kang winter tyres scored better than the Conti Sport Contacts overall.
Sucked badly at low temps? All the tests were performed under this magic 7C barrier you keep banging on about were they not?
The reason it scored badly overall was because they gave it -30 on the snow score, ignoring the snow test scores I wouldn't be surprised if it won the test though I can't be bothered to actually check the numbers.
In my book, the fact it had damn good scores for everything except the snow test just goes to show that in fact it seems the whole 'winter tyres are vastly better as soon as it's a bit cold' thing is nonsense.
EVO said:Wet: Marginally preferred the feel to the winter version, only 8th fastest wet lap time.
Snow: Couldn't even get to the start line for the snow handling!