********* The Official GTA V (5) thread! *********
- Thread starter TheVoice
- Start date
Caporegime
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 26,779
They are idiotic comments when you don't know what you're talking about.
EDIT: It's definitely going to be set in Los Santos at least. San Andreas was a state if you guys remember, it had Las Vegas, San Franciso and Los Angeles, this might only have a massive version of L.A instead of the other areas. If they manage to pull off something the size of San Andreas in the RAGE engine with that amount of detail in the other cities too then this game is going to be worth it purely for the sandbox stuff.
EDIT 2: Just noticed Mount Chiliad in the trailer.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 26,779
Hah! Looks a bit too chubby for Niko though.
I think it will have a lot more stuff to do between missions. GTA4 was their first attempt on the current gen consoles, I know there were expansion packs to GTA4 which weren't particularly amazing but they did offer some new mini games and stuff. I think the main problem with GTA4 is that New York City doesn't have much diversity in the way of landscapes, it's pretty much all urban and that's it.
If they nail this and they put the countryside areas, along with Las Venturas and San Fierro then it could be amazing. If you compare GTA3 and San Andreas, GTA3 was Rockstars first attempt at a GTA game on the PS2, compared with San Andreas it had virtually nothing to do outside of the main missions. There was the car collection missions, the "hidden" telephone missions and a few mini games that you could do when in specific vehicles.
Then there was San Andreas where you could enter triathlons, hit the weights, go out for food, take people on dates, properly customize your outfit and haircut, customize cars, upgrade your combat and physical skills, play poker at the casinos, take flying lessons, driving lessons, boating lessons... loads compared to 3.
Oh boy, do I!Remember when we used to play SA online?
Perhaps V will recapture some of the magic.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2004
- Posts
- 14,081
- Location
- Between Realities
First trailer and you're wanting to go right to third base. I hope you're not like this on a first date.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 26,779
I don't think you'll play as multiple characters in the one game. RDR was a bit different as the main character died, I don't think they'd kill off Tommy if it is indeed him. One thing's for sure though, they better bring back Ray Liotta and the trailer didn't sound like it was Ray Liotta.
The trailer for V doesn't particularly grab me. They need to show more than that.
I love GTAIV but I think it's mainly because of the driving aspect of the game and because I have an obsession with driving the police cars. I love the way traffic will move for you (apart from when they stop in front of you and don't move out the way).
The previous GTA I played was GTA2 on the PS1 and apart from the obvious differences the main thing I noticed was that in the new one you don't get a sense of a gangs turf. In the old one if you did too many missions for a particular gang and stepped into another gangs territory you would get shot at the moment you stepped into their boundary and then your allied gang would start shooting back at them.
What happened to stealing a police officers car from outside the station and then being chased by a RC car rigged with a bomb?
The missions felt more exciting, I recall one particular one which I don't think I could ever complete where you had to steal a tank but there would be army all over you. I don't think there is a single mission in IV which feels like I'm being naughty.
Displacing an armoured vehicle from a helicopter by shooting the bolts and then driving off with it and being chased by the police (who are so easy to outrun) is naughty but I just don't feel it.
Perhaps it's because I'm older and I'm more de-sensitised?
I love GTAIV but I think it's mainly because of the driving aspect of the game and because I have an obsession with driving the police cars. I love the way traffic will move for you (apart from when they stop in front of you and don't move out the way).
The previous GTA I played was GTA2 on the PS1 and apart from the obvious differences the main thing I noticed was that in the new one you don't get a sense of a gangs turf. In the old one if you did too many missions for a particular gang and stepped into another gangs territory you would get shot at the moment you stepped into their boundary and then your allied gang would start shooting back at them.
What happened to stealing a police officers car from outside the station and then being chased by a RC car rigged with a bomb?
The missions felt more exciting, I recall one particular one which I don't think I could ever complete where you had to steal a tank but there would be army all over you. I don't think there is a single mission in IV which feels like I'm being naughty.
Displacing an armoured vehicle from a helicopter by shooting the bolts and then driving off with it and being chased by the police (who are so easy to outrun) is naughty but I just don't feel it.
Perhaps it's because I'm older and I'm more de-sensitised?
It's not a trailer per se, it's more a Teaser, they did a teaser a while back with IV just to show the engine, city, graphics.
thats not r8..
Caporegime
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 26,779
Just Audi latching on to a bit of free publicity.
I could have just made it up myself unless the source is credible? There's absolutely NO WAY someone would leak the end of the story before any other details have even officially been announced.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Feb 2006
- Posts
- 1,644
- Location
- Southampton, UK
Cannot wait for E3 now!
Look at the number plate at .51 seconds. It says San Andreas
Also the large Vinewood hollywood like sign in the middle of the trailer which was also a location set in San Andreas.
