40+40x0+1 =

It may not be strictly adhered to hence the confusion that arises from the question but that is in and of itself a problem - if conventions such as this aren't followed then it becomes much more difficult to ensure that people will interpret maths equations in the same way and therefore arrive at the same answer. Part of the usefulness of maths is that you can apply the same processes and arrive at the same answer as others, if you remove that then it becomes much less useful. That said it's an equation that could (and should) be more clearly written as a good principle is to remove ambiguity where you can.

I entirely agree, when I was at school the order of operation was avoided as much as possible, i.e. it was not drummed into students and was avoided with the use of brackets, of course the order of exponents had to be made clear to avoid things like 3x(b^2) and instead have 3b^2. As you rightly say, ambiguity is the problem, and this adds an extra confusion to people learning mathematics that they could do without.
 
[FnG]magnolia;20547574 said:
Bodmans? Do you want a flake in that, love?

Boddingtons.jpg


Melanie Sykes says "so close and yet so far away...". ;) But I appreciated the reference anyway.
 
I was never taught any acronym like BODMAS but was certainly taught the order of operations.

You have to be careful with BODMAS, the precedence order is :
Brackets,
Orders (i.e powers)
Divide AND Multiple, with precedence taken from left to right
Add AND Subtract, with precedence taken from left to right

i.e., Divide does not have a precedence over multiple, same for add and subtract. The convention is to read the equation left to right in this case.


For the people that don't get it, how would you work out something like 5x + 10y - 4z, if you don't take the multiplications as highest priority then it makes no sense.
 
If there wasn't an order of precedence maths wouldn't work.

Take for example a x (b + c).

Expand the brackets to get a x b + a x c

If a=2, b=3 and c=4

the top gives us 2 x (3+4) = 2 x 7 = 14

Using BODMAS gives us 2 x 3 + 2 x 4 = 6 + 8 = 14

If you just read across you would get 2 x 3 + 2 x 4 = 6 + 2 x 4 = 8 x 4 = 32 which is clearly wrong.

So yes, the rules and laws of maths are there to ensure it all works consistently.

Thank you.
Took me a good five minutes to get my head around this line, 2 x 3 + 2 x 4 = 6 + 2 x 4 = 8 x 4 = 32 in context. :D

I was like
2e3rj2b.jpg
similar to when I play chess.
I don't have a good capacity for maths.
 
[TW]Sponge;20541923 said:
Who the hell uses maths like that?!

Banks when they calculate the interest you owe them.. Or if you're lucky, how much they owe you.. So programmers may translate such an equation into a program so you don't have to worry about this kind of thing. So really you're kind of right... And this is it in a nutshell really, unless there's a specific need or interest then there is no need for the knowledge as there are tools that do it for us.

For example, if I were calculating interesting then the equation would look like this:

Let's say you borrowed £5000 at a rate of 5% for 200 days
Amount x rate / basis x number of days

Translates to
(Amount x (rate / basis)) x number of days
So you would do the divide first and so forth
(5000 x (.0500/365)) x 200 = 136.99

It would be a completely different answer if done from left to right..

(hopes i'm right ) :p
 
Banks when they calculate the interest you owe them.. Or if you're lucky, how much they owe you.. So programmers may translate such an equation into a program so you don't have to worry about this kind of thing. So really you're kind of right... And this is it in a nutshell really, unless there's a specific need or interest then there is no need for the knowledge as there are tools that do it for us.

For example, if I were calculating interesting then the equation would look like this:

Let's say you borrowed £5000 at a rate of 5% for 200 days
Amount x rate / basis x number of days

Translates to
(Amount x (rate / basis)) x number of days
So you would do the divide first and so forth
(5000 x (.0500/365)) x 200 = 136.99

It would be a completely different answer if done from left to right..

(hopes i'm right ) :p

jackiechanmemex.png
 
Out of curiosity I gave the sum to my two kids last night, 8 year old and 12 year old, both came back with 41 (the 12 year old glanced at it an answered, smart ass :D ).

I learnt this at school (late 70's early 80's), although it wasn't called BODMAS (you can't really move beyond basic 2+2 without learning it).

I can understand how most people would forget if they don't use it day to day though.

I don't think the lack of brackets is lazy, the sum is written correctly with or without. I'd only use brackets where absolutely necessary.
 
I imagine I'm generating a fair bit of ire suggesting that bodmas is redundant in the face of a well written expression... And I'm being fairly bloody minded about that.

Nah convention is necessary even with a well written expression otherwise you'd get a very messy expression.
 
ok, I'll play the ignorant party and say 81, purely because

40 + 40 = 80

80 x 0 = 0

80 + 1 + 81

I thought you needed to express it with (brackets) for that equation to work?

Probably why I failed maths
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom