I have two spaces in my PC case for SSDs using the akasa 2 SSD converter in the floppy drive slot.
My Rampage III Extreme also has two marvel Sata III ports, but these dont run any faster with raid, but do provide 366 mb/s read speed on my 64 Gb crucial C300.
I decided to pre order the £119 Adata drive and use it in the second Sata III slot. My 64 Gb C300 is good enough for my boot drive, and then I can use the Adata drive for whichever games I currently play.
However I'm now wondering if getting two of them and running them in raid 0 on the sata II ports as both my OS and gaming drive would be any more beneficial over running one seperately on sata III.
Space isnt really the concern, just whether I would see any benefit from two of them in raid 0 on sata II vs a single drive on sata III.
I'm considering throwing my money away to grab a pair of them while they are £1 per Gb. Also the news that Intel are adding trim support to SSDs in raid makes it even more appealing.
My Rampage III Extreme also has two marvel Sata III ports, but these dont run any faster with raid, but do provide 366 mb/s read speed on my 64 Gb crucial C300.
I decided to pre order the £119 Adata drive and use it in the second Sata III slot. My 64 Gb C300 is good enough for my boot drive, and then I can use the Adata drive for whichever games I currently play.
However I'm now wondering if getting two of them and running them in raid 0 on the sata II ports as both my OS and gaming drive would be any more beneficial over running one seperately on sata III.
Space isnt really the concern, just whether I would see any benefit from two of them in raid 0 on sata II vs a single drive on sata III.
I'm considering throwing my money away to grab a pair of them while they are £1 per Gb. Also the news that Intel are adding trim support to SSDs in raid makes it even more appealing.