Other than the fact that they don't look anywhere near as good as a coupe and are less practical (only seat 4 in some cases)
Going off previous BMW models, surely the 640i would actually be the 635i due to it being a twin turbo 3L straight-six?
The model designations are getting ever further from the simpler days.
[TW]Fox;20781396 said:Simpler days like when? 1996 when a 323i had a 2.5 litre engine? Maybe back further to the mid 80's where you could buy a 325e with a 2.7 litre engine? What about the 1982 316 with... a 1.8?
Or perhaps, in reality, BMW have had model names dissassociated with engine capacity for decades and decades?![]()
I would say, the majority has always been accurate:
320
etc, etc![]()
Have they not given the same engines two different names now though? They havent done that before though, surely?
I would say, the majority has always been accurate:
320
etc, etc![]()
And this is why the diesel works so well. It's as noiseless as it needs to be, nicely quick without ever feeling like it's trying too hard, and although the claimed mpg is predictably optimistic, we happily got over 40mpg, which means 600 miles between fill-ups. It's a typically lovely engine to use, although we do wish that BMW would desist from playing fast-and-loose with the badging - it's the exact same unit as in the 535d.
Have they not given the same engines two different names now though? They havent done that before though, surely?
Top Gear getting it wrong?
http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/cars/bmw-6-series-640d-m-sport-coupe-review-50005796/
Except it's a single turbo 6 cylinder in the 640i. 650i is a V8 twin turbo (only 2dr coupe and convertible at present).
The model designations are getting ever further from the simpler days.
Evo seems to think that it's a Twin Turbo in the 640i. The 650i is the current M5 engine, detuned.