Proof of Fox News' agenda - INSIDE!

No it's not.

(also to get to maths 101 they must have made it into college.)





yes, which would be advertisers based on their viewing figures and any tv network they sell shows to. (they make a lot of shows)

Tefal you have stockholm syndrome.
 
[TW]Fox;20786428 said:
How can it be anything other than incompetence and poor quality control? Anyone with half a brain making a concious decision to misrepresent the graph in that manner would know it would fool almost nobody and achieve nothing, which means it can only have been a stupid mistake.

It certainly demonstrates how little credibility they have, but not for the cool and funky conspiracy reason.

why not?


it's a daily news show most things like that are probbaly knocked up in a few minutes by some near minimum wage back room graphics guy everyday who really doesn't give a ****.

This is more proof of your agenda than fox's really.

Maybe you're both right and it's just shocking quality control but why don't people use something like Excel which when you add a new data point and refresh will simply redraw it properly and to scale.

I suppose the basic point is why use something that produces such a rubbish output when there are multiple options that will allow you to produce something that actually works as it was intended to do. A graph like that where they include the numbers makes it immediately obvious that something has gone wrong with the trend so their equivalent of a proof reader needs a good hard slap to get them to pay attention.
 
Maybe you're both right and it's just shocking quality control but why don't people use something like Excel which when you add a new data point and refresh will simply redraw it properly and to scale.

too much hassle to then convert to a tv friendly graphic?


it's probbaly quicker just to let the guy draw it.


so their equivalent of a proof reader needs a good hard slap to get them to pay attention.

So does the guardian's but no one claims their famous spelling errors are part of a conspiracy.
 
too much hassle to then convert to a tv friendly graphic?


it's probbaly quicker just to let the guy draw it.

Oh ho ho ho, I spy with my little eye something beginning with "gap in the software market".

... hm. It also ends like that.

Edit: also Fox has done far worse things than this.
 
[TW]Fox;20786428 said:
How can it be anything other than incompetence and poor quality control? Anyone with half a brain making a concious decision to misrepresent the graph in that manner would know it would fool almost nobody and achieve nothing, which means it can only have been a stupid mistake.

Don't you profess the public to be stupid en masse?

There would be a reason.
 
Because the BBC isn't incredibly biased toward Labour, and Sky News isn't incredibly biased toward the Conservatives. Remember when Adam Boulton was practically foaming at the mouth after the election that Labour was clinging onto power for several days whilst a coalition agreement was negotiated?
 
And yet none of the results are relevant the search terms :p Great job, Google :D

It does provide interesting items like this..

www.staff.city.ac.uk/~sj361/Intermedia2001.PDF

Overall it would seem that people have concluded it to be more Pro Conservative than anything over the course.

Google also gives some of the Sun's moans..

"THE Tory leader was stitched up when footage of him adjusting his hair was sneakily fed to all broadcasters"

"THE Basil Brush Show featured a school election with a cheat called Dave wearing a blue rosette."

"A POLL on The One Show ignored issues with Gordon Brown to ask only, Is David Cameron too much of a toff to be PM? "

:D
 
This would be the same station that declared Obama Bin Laden dead, had a woman on decrying the sex scene in Mass Effect polluting children's minds without actually seeing it and any number of other things.

Fox News is a joke and the world knows it. Well apart from its viewers of course, but they are beyond help.
 
Back
Top Bottom