Only if we can add pedos and rapists to that list
The law, morality and what is deemed "ok"
- Thread starter Jay794
- Start date
Only if we can add pedos and rapists to that list
Jesus ******* christ.
Alcohol doesn't improve you're ability to drive. Go tell that to my three friends graves.
The people you know who have drove under the influence shouldn't be driving again.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 35,711
Like I said, they did a test, not sure how reliable it was but the results showed that the drunk guy did better on the test, but LIKE I SAID, it's not fool-proof as there are too many variables
Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 77,672
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
Hands up to thinks LucidLogix® has drink drive many many times?
My opinion to question 3) was that the farmer deserved the prison sentence. I agree people should be able to use any force they deem necessary to protect their property. But that farmer turned the game around and went after the trespasser with the intent for revenge.
There have been other cases over the last 6 months where people have had their homes broken into at night and i think one stabbed a burglar. Which as harsh as it is to say i say tough luck to the burglar. The home owner wouldn't have had any intentions of killing someone if they didn't break into his family home at night.
As much as i understand it's quite a grey area of the law when it comes to protecting your property and family. But my opinion would be that any home owner protecting their property/family etc should be able to use any force they wish, unless the burglar manages to escape and has clear intentions of leaving immediately then the home owner should obviously not be allowed to use any force.
Some of you may think that killing someone who breaks into your home as unjustified. But it comes down to the crystal clear fact that the burglar shouldn't have been there in the first place and had clear intentions to break into a home. It wasn't as if he accidently stumbled into a home to steal things.
There have been other cases over the last 6 months where people have had their homes broken into at night and i think one stabbed a burglar. Which as harsh as it is to say i say tough luck to the burglar. The home owner wouldn't have had any intentions of killing someone if they didn't break into his family home at night.
As much as i understand it's quite a grey area of the law when it comes to protecting your property and family. But my opinion would be that any home owner protecting their property/family etc should be able to use any force they wish, unless the burglar manages to escape and has clear intentions of leaving immediately then the home owner should obviously not be allowed to use any force.
Some of you may think that killing someone who breaks into your home as unjustified. But it comes down to the crystal clear fact that the burglar shouldn't have been there in the first place and had clear intentions to break into a home. It wasn't as if he accidently stumbled into a home to steal things.
There was a case I heard of recently, somebody broke into a house, got stuck in the garage, the family was away on holiday and the guy had to survive by eating dog food for a week.
When the family returned home the guy sued them (for keeping him captive against his will or failing to have proper exits or something) AND WON!?
Not sure how true that is though
When the family returned home the guy sued them (for keeping him captive against his will or failing to have proper exits or something) AND WON!?
Not sure how true that is though
I think that the username LucidLogix is liberally laced with irony....
Last edited:
Probably about as true as that chinese restaurant near you that closed because it served dogs that doesn't actually exist.
wouldn't surprise me if it was true
It exists in every city, town and village
! Does he still believe in Santa like old wives tales.And that is why you sir, are on my ignore list, now either contribute to the thread constructively or get the **** out
It exists in every city, town and village
Same as above to you to, btw, there's only one old fat bearded guy who brings me presents, and it aint santa.... it's that creepy uncle steve who keeps telling me that what happened that day is our little secret lol
Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 77,672
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
I call BS, sure, there is something call the Occupier's Liability's Act. Not sure how he got trapped would come under that. Since he was breaking and entering.
Another rule of Equity for you. The Maxim "One who comes into equity must come with clean hands"
I won't lose any sleep over being on your ignore list, as you seemingly can't resist clicking to view my posts anyway
I've contributed to the thread perfectly constructively, you're just upset because in doing so, you've come out looking daft (again).
Permabanned
- Joined
- 23 Dec 2011
- Posts
- 83
- Location
- Cardiff, South Wales
Just because some idiots drunk drive doesn't mean it can't be done.
Some people as already stated respond differently. I don't get drunk yet I'd still be over the limit as i have done tests in my house where I have scored 0.50 and i've been perfectly sober, not feeling a thing.
I know for a fact I can do anything when i've had a drink. Those people who killed your mates obviously couldn't handle their drink. Loads of people can be considered over the limit but can drive perfectly fine without a problem.
As stated, i know people who've drunk and drive and are some of the safest drivers on the road. Don't blame everyone for a few idiots who got behind the wheel when they weren't in the condition to drive. Thats individual idiocy. They should have done a self risk assessment.
