Man of Honour
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2004
- Posts
- 25,821
- Location
- Glasgow
I'm aware of the theory that you mention, and can see it's point. For instance If an explorer came back from the Amazon and claimed there was an animal that no one had ever seen before but he hadn't been able to bring one back as proof, would I personaly take the stand that he' can't prove it so it doesn't ? proberly not because i'm aware that even now we are still discovering new animal species all the time.
But the above would be a valid and testable hypothesis to use Occam's Razor on - we're assuming a real animal here with no magical properties i.e. it takes up physical space and has presence. In such a case you can test for it, it's a falsifiable hypothesis which is fundamental to being able to scientifically test for it - where there are unique events or the claim is for something with supernatural powers then science isn't the thing to test for it. By all means use science to test for things that are claimed to impact on the physical world but remember that applying it outwith the area it is meant for means that your results may be unreliable and anything you then subsequently decide from those results is at best on "faith" as you've extrapolated.
But religious concepts that come from the mind are a lot harder to give credence too. They are only thoughts and ideas which are very very powerful BUT they are not physical objects that we can see, touch, feel, smell. We only give them life in our minds, where i believe anything can exist including heaven and hell ?
If you feel i'm trying to use the "Occam's Razor" train of thought, then it's honestly not intentional. I think it's just the way I look at life in general.
Even though this type of thread crops up regular, I like talking about it, it's different and a hell of a lot deeper than my mates usual talks about football, pot, how smashed you can get etc![]()
Religious concepts are harder for many people to give credence to, I more or less skirt the issue in many ways because of my philosophical standpoint - it doesn't much matter to me whether a god does or doesn't exist as there appears to be no impact on my life either way so I don't give the question much thought on an everyday basis.
Sounds very much like the panoramic life review experienced by people who have a NDE.
Death, a character in one of Terry Pratchett's diskworld series said this;
“It is said that your life flashes before your eyes just before you die. That is true, it's called Life.” ― The Last Continent
It does but that specific phenomenon doesn't actually speak to the existence of heaven or hell which is why I was clarifying.
I'm wondering where our thread starter has got to?



