Stephen lawrence cover up?

Visage said:
There's no longer any chance of the guys involved being convicted, thanks (as ever) to the numbnuts at the Daily Hate....
Click to expand...

Did the Daily Mail steal the vital evidence, or did you just see an oportunity to use a sentence slagging off the Daily Mail?
 
I dont know about you guys but I'm fully aware Stephen was/is black. Why does the media feel the needs to state this all the time?

As for the whole case I find it strange... If they truly were guilty I would think the case wouldve been over years ago.
 
DAIR said:
I dont know about you guys but I'm fully aware Stephen was/is black. Why does the media feel the needs to state this all the time?

As for the whole case I find it strange... If they truly were guilty I would think the case wouldve been over years ago.
Click to expand...

An advance in forensic science :)

I imagine the fact it was a hate crime is why the media state the colour of his skin so much.
 
Why is this such a big deal?

He's guilty, lock him up for life, and move on, why is the news dwelling on this so much?
 
Unsafe verdict but entirely predictable, the State always wanted to convict these men for this crime and have done so despite two trials, highly prejudicial newspaper coverage and demonstrably unsafe forensic evidence which should never have been allowed to be admitted as evidence.
 
scorza said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriss_Donald
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Hopley

All murders are bad, whether racist or not. The PC witchhunt following the Stephen Lawrence murder is going too far, its crippling the police.
Click to expand...
Interesting points.

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown makes a good point below,

Yasmin Alibhai Brown also cited the Donald case when highlighting the lack of concern for white victims of racist murders the one sided approach to the issue.

She drew comparisons with high profile ethnic minority vicitms, asking whether Donald's murderers were "less evil than those who killed Stephen Lawrence?".

Alibhai Brown came to the conclusion that treating "some victims as more worthy of condemnation than others is unforgivable – and a betrayal of anti-racism itself
 
dirtydog said:
Unsafe verdict but entirely predictable, the State always wanted to convict these men for this crime and have done so despite two trials, highly prejudicial newspaper coverage and demonstrably unsafe forensic evidence which should never have been allowed to be admitted as evidence.
Click to expand...
The Court of Appeal, led by the LCJ, allowed it to be admitted and a jury convicted on it.

They're racist murderers and it's pretty telling that the BNP et al see such garbage as their heroes.

Have fun in prison, boys!
 
I think the problem is more sensationalism, they can sell more papers if they can bring the whole racism thing in - I doubt it's due to some misguided attempt to follow political correctness.

These people hacked the phones of the family's of war victims some of them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom