Poll: Why does England still have a royal family?

Are you pro or anti royal?

  • Total voters
    604
Castiel said:
Sure thing.

People really shouldn't post on a internet forum when they are drunk.
Click to expand...

He also a **** as he has to wait for a servant to flip down his seat before sitting down instead of doing it himself.

If you want to call such "out of touch" people Prince or Princess go ahead. The man is living in kukoo land, anyone who has 10 butlers is a ****
 
Craterloads said:
He also a **** as he has to wait for a servant to flip down his seat before sitting down instead of doing it himself.

If you want to call such "out of touch" people Prince or Princess go ahead. The man is living in kukoo land, anyone who has 10 butlers is a ****
Click to expand...

So you are jealous because someone has more than you?

Pointless posting, pointless.
 
Craterloads said:
He also a **** as he has to wait for a servant to flip down his seat before sitting down instead of doing it himself.

If you want to call such "out of touch" people Prince or Princess go ahead. The man is living in kukoo land, anyone who has 10 butlers is a ****
Click to expand...


I think we know who is actually living in cloud cuckoo land, don't we.

Quit trolling, you don't like the Prince of Wales....we get it.
 
@ Craterloads

I would be interested to see your proof that any of the royals have somoene to squeeze their toothpaste or lower the loo seat for them.

But please continue to spout childish drivel you are doing a much better job of proving your ignorance than any other member on here could.

/Salsa
 
Shayper said:
So you are jealous because someone has more than you?

Pointless posting, pointless.
Click to expand...

When its from the taxpayers money, then yes. The whole point...

Castiel said:
I think we know who is actually living in cloud cuckoo land, don't we.

Quit trolling, you don't like the Prince of Wales....we get it.
Click to expand...

Wheres the trolling, you questioned why i called him a **** and ive given you some of the ***** things he does.

You made irrelavent points regarding him doing charity work etc and i pointed out so do many normal people.
 
Craterloads said:
When its from the taxpayers money, then yes. The whole point...



Wheres the trolling, you questioned why i called him a **** and ive given you some of the ***** things he does.

You made irrelavent points regarding him doing charity work etc and i pointed out so do many normal people.
Click to expand...

So you haven't really read the whole thread. You may have looked at it, but you haven't taken in any of the points made. They aren't funded by the taxpayer, they give more money in taxes than they take out.

And you have pulled facts from nowhere and claimed they are **** things he does.

Get a grip, before you get banned.
 
Shayper said:
So you haven't really read the whole thread. You may have looked at it, but you haven't taken in any of the points made. They aren't funded by the taxpayer, they give more money in taxes than they take out.

And you have pulled facts from nowhere and claimed they are **** things he does.

Get a grip, before you get banned.
Click to expand...

You keep throwing banned/suspended around. Who died and made you a mod?

Are you still buthurt from the other thread when i told to go "read the thread" before jumping in :o

Im just giving my opinion regarding the royals, the whole point of this thread...

But pardon me if any opinion that doesnt support the "royals" is unwanted
 
Craterloads said:
Wheres the trolling, you questioned why i called him a **** and ive given you some of the ***** things he does.

You made irrelavent points regarding him doing charity work etc and i pointed out so do many normal people.
Click to expand...

Simply the amount of swearing by proxy that you feel is necessary constitutes trollong, not to mention that no a single one of your claims is actually supported by evidence.....

And you are right many people do charity work....however very few do as much or are as enthusiastic across a veritable myriad of organisations as Prince Charles....not to mention that the very fact of WHO he is and the title he wears raises awareness and encourages voluntary contributions from across the world which goes to directly help not only 13-30 year olds in accomplishing something in their lives as well as helping them to better prospects which in turn help society as a whole, but also to the other 17 or so charities which make up the Princes Charities Organisation. This doesn't touch on his environmental and other work devoted to bringing awareness to the homeless, disabled, education and the elderly.

This is in addition to his official duties of State.

So yes you are trolling, or being rude for the sake of it. Your choice.
 
Craterloads said:
You keep throwing banned/suspended around. Who died and made you a mod?

Are you still buthurt from the other thread when i told to go "read the thread" before jumping in :o

Im just giving my opinion regarding the royals, the whole point of this thread...

But pardon me if any opinion that doesnt support the "royals" is unwanted
Click to expand...

Ermm...

Firstly, never claimed I was a mod or otherwise, I was simply advising you that your current behaviour, going by past standards, is tending towards what the mods may see as ban worthy.

Secondly, I'm not butthurt at all. I apologised for that post...

And there are plenty of people in this thread who don't support the royals, I'm just fed up with people citing "facts" which blatantly come from the planet bull****.
 
Fair point, still doesnt make him "royal" He could be saving kids from burning buildings on a daily basis for all i care.

The Prince still employs 149 staff, down three on last year, with 25 allocated for personal use by himself
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Craterloads said:
Fair point, still doesnt make him "royal" He could be saving kids from burning buildings on a daily basis for all i care.
Click to expand...

Just because he has servants doesn't mean he doesn't do anything himself.

Just because a CEO of a company - in fact we will call him an inherited CEO for aptness - has many, many employees doesnt mean he doesn't do stuff himself. What a petty argument to have...
 
Milkybk said:
So basically you don't have an argument you're just chatting ****. What a surprise. :rolleyes:

GD is far to full of idiots now, it's gone past a joke. It's actually managing to ruin the quality of a slightly more "light-hearted" sub-forum.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Between him and easyrider tonight it's ridiculous :rolleyes:
 
Craterloads said:
Fair point, still doesnt make him "royal" He could be saving kids from burning buildings on a daily basis for all i care.
Click to expand...

Any person with a workload and range of responsibilites such as his employs a gamut of staff. From Treasurers to Charity Organisers to Security to Estate workers and so on. Not to mention when they refer to the Princes' household, they are refering not only to him personally, but also his sons and all their official duties also. Not to mention the running of his household, estates, correspondence, upkeep of said houses and grounds, Press secretaries, private secretaries resonsible for his duties to Wales and the various Commonweath Countries where his has official duties, and I could go on.....

Stop reading the daily mail...its bad for your objectivity and education.
 
Last edited:
Shayper said:
Just because he has servants doesn't mean he doesn't do anything himself.

Just because a CEO of a company - in fact we will call him an inherited CEO for aptness - has many, many employees doesnt mean he doesn't do stuff himself. What a petty argument to have...
Click to expand...

These are just some personal grievances on why i called him a ****. Whether you share such opinions is irrelevant.

The "royals" as a whole, as an undemocratic institution is obvious in itself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom