Poll: Let us vote in an OCuk Referendum:

Should the Scots have independence

  • Yes - I am English

    Votes: 201 34.5%
  • No - I am English

    Votes: 174 29.9%
  • Yes - I am Irish/Northern Irish

    Votes: 7 1.2%
  • No - I am Irish/Northern Irish

    Votes: 9 1.5%
  • Yes - I am Scottish

    Votes: 24 4.1%
  • No - I am Scottish

    Votes: 51 8.8%
  • Yes - I am Welsh

    Votes: 6 1.0%
  • No - I am Welsh

    Votes: 9 1.5%
  • Yes - mixed/other nationality

    Votes: 11 1.9%
  • No - mixed/other nationality

    Votes: 8 1.4%
  • Indifferent - any nationality

    Votes: 82 14.1%

  • Total voters
    582
If Scotland goes, then the UK should move the headquarters of the two largest Scottish banks, owned by the UK taxpayer. Those banks should be renamed and relocated to England, Wales or NI. The Student Loans Company's HQ should also be relocated from Glasgow. Why should Scotland administer the fees for students who are not Scottish? The list can go on for ever.

If the SNP think their people want independence then they should have a referendum now.

In fact:
The plans will adopt a “best of British” theme. They will include:
● Keeping the Queen as Scotland’s head of state and the royal family.
● Keeping the pound as Scotland’s currency.
● Relying on the Bank of England to anchor for that currency.
● Allowing interest rates to be set by the London-based Monetary Policy Committee for the whole of the UK.
● Creating a new “social union” between Scotland and England to replace the existing parliamentary union.
● Keeping UK embassies as joint UK/Scottish bases.
● Keeping most BBC programmes in their usual places – so Scots can continue to watch EastEnders and their other favourite shows at the usual time.
● Allowing British defence forces to use Scottish bases and to work alongside Scottish service personnel.
● Setting up only the most minimal control posts on the Scottish–English border.
● Keeping the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency as the body organising driving licences for the whole of the UK, including an independent Scotland.
● Keeping the same sort of vehicle number plates in an independent Scotland as in the rest of the UK.

Source

Are they taking the mick? Independence should be a real independence, not a phony one. They want independence from the UK, but don't mind riding off the back of its resources?

An independent Scotland is a disaster.
 
Last edited:
I am a Scot. Hath not a Scot eyes? Hath not a Scot hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as an English is? If you ***** us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not lol? if we read Britboy posts, do we not facepalm? and if you troll us, shall we not revenge?
 
Because people don't know a good thing when they see one and ultimately why referendums are a terrible idea. :p

Different political parties are meant to offer change, not just more of the same old. I think its healthy to have this type of debates from time to time and more change should be advocate with political parties.

As for independance the opposing parties not only have to show the Scottish people that being part of the UK is better for Scotland, they have to show the rest of the UK that having Scotland as part of it is the best deal for their own country or could risk a new problem rising.

Salmond just has to show the Scottish people they get a better deal, which in my eyes is probably easier than the above.

Sadly its all just talk at the moment and is easy to pick the problems from either side. What will be interesting is when the parties start defining what it really is with plans backed up with the right information for or against.
 
I am British, live in England and currently work in Scotland. If the Scottish want independance then fair enough, they should have it. Personally I think it is a bad idea as I think the UK is stronger together than being apart but I can see why they want to be masters of their own destiny.

I despise all the nationalistic crap that goes with all this independance debate and that falls on both sides of the border. I work with Scots up in Edinburgh and there isnt any of this nonsense, we are all friends and have a laugh with each other. Many of my work friends/colleagues are currently sitting on the fence because they just dont know the financial implications and I doubt there will be an honest look at this.
 
As for independance the opposing parties not only have to show the Scottish people that being part of the UK is better for Scotland, they have to show the rest of the UK that having Scotland as part of it is the best deal for their own country or could risk a new problem rising.

That's incredibly difficult to do when the fanatical supporters of independence spout rhetoric's such as 'English rule', 'Oppression' and 'Bullying'. There's no way to counter those arguments and merely seem's to frustrate supporters of the union.


Salmond just has to show the Scottish people they get a better deal, which in my eyes is probably easier than the above.

It's up to the Scottish to ensure that they hold everything that Dear Leader says to account, taking this process based on sound bites is a dangerous game.


Sadly its all just talk at the moment and is easy to pick the problems from either side. What will be interesting is when the parties start defining what it really is with plans backed up with the right information for or against.

Both sides have convincing arguments for and against in both social and economic terms, but what cannot be denied is that the UK is only the UK it is because of the Union. I'd expect now that there will be a steady flow of information from both sides on how they will tackle matters but it's in both sides interest to ensure that what happens after the breakup is more important than how we breakup.
 
I am curious as to how much support there is in Scotland for independence. The cynic in me says the SNP simply bashes on about it to score cheap political points as they know Westminster is going to oppose them all the way, with the actual chance of full, independent nation status being very slim.

Still I believe in the right to self-determination, so if they want a referendum, regardless of legal wrangling they should have one.
 
Until the New Scottish Conservative Party get elected by the newly installed Scottish middleclasses after several years of socialism taxing them to support ever increasing public sector costs......

lol.
My Uncle used to vote conservative. We don't speak to that part of the family now.

Are they taking the mick? Independence should be a real independence, not a phony one. They want independence from the UK, but don't mind riding off the back of its resources?
It is misconstrued to think that the SNP want to sever all ties with the rest of the UK. Linking into the bank of England is a smart idea. I can think of at least 1 other small country that does this with a larger neighbour with great success. An independant Scotland can still contribute to the rest of the British Isles as it does now.
I am curious as to how much support there is in Scotland for independence.

My guess it is close to the 50% mark. The SNP want to give the right to vote to 16/17 year olds where support for Indepenence is much higher.
 
My opinion: the Scots can have their independence if they truly want it, but it'll be a damn shame to split up what has been a remarkably successful partnership and it will make a lot of things unnecessarily complicated.

If a split does take place, I hope it is a proper split.
 
That's incredibly difficult to do when the fanatical supporters of independence spout rhetoric's such as 'English rule', 'Oppression' and 'Bullying'. There's no way to counter those arguments and merely seem's to frustrate supporters of the union.

Thankfully such support through this is small and not wide spread. Best it does is make for a good show/some news for the media. Its better not to bring attention to these types of supporters.

It's up to the Scottish to ensure that they hold everything that Dear Leader says to account, taking this process based on sound bites is a dangerous game.

Very ill informed here. For a starter the general public opinion of Salmond (aka Dear Leader) isn’t that great among most Scots from my experience. Assuming a majority of people will vote based on sound bites is just plain silly, although some will but the same can be said for any type of vote.
 
I'm English, I say let them go if they want. We can always conquer Scotland again if we want it back in the future. :p
 
I am a Scot. Hath not a Scot eyes? Hath not a Scot hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as an English is? If you ***** us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not lol? if we read Britboy posts, do we not facepalm? and if you troll us, shall we not revenge?

Not bad. :D
 
This is often misunderstood....also the Gas Fields are arguably far more financially viable than the Oil Fields.....something people might eant to consider.

It's what gets me every time. To most people when talking about "oil" revenue they mean both revenue from O&G, do the Scottish nationalists mean the same? I don't think anyone knows, it would make a huge difference to whether Salmonds obsession with 90% of the "Oil" revenue is correct or not though...

Meh, well whichever natural resource we can plunder :)

I also can't be bothered getting a second passport, however much I'd love one...

kd

A second passport from Scotland really isn't going to do much tbh, not like having an Australian or US passport really is it.:p

And ouch at the poll, around 2/3rds of Scots don't want independence but more than half the English want Scotland independent...
 
Back
Top Bottom