Lost in translation.

Permabanned
Joined
5 Jun 2010
Posts
15,459
The NHS spends £64,000 a day on translation services, a report reveals today.

The cost to the taxpayer has risen by 17 per cent since 2007, with more than £23million spent last year.

Experts said huge sums could be saved if hospitals and GP surgeries pooled resources – and warned that translating information for those who do not speak English could encourage segregation.

Following freedom of information requests to every NHS trust, the report states that the Health Service spent £23.3million on written translation and interpreters last year.

Some trusts translated material into 120 languages.

Julia Manning, of 2020Health, the think-tank that conducted the research, said: ‘The costs involved are truly staggering in an age of austerity, and incredible when taken in the context of efficiency savings of £20billion across the Health Service.

What a shocking waste of money.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Costs-rise-hospitals-cater-120-languages.html
 
Yeah, let's stop giving people who don't speak English medical advice. It'll be cheaper when they have to go to A&E.
 
I'm not an expert, but I say more money would be saved if no translation services were provided on the nhs. English is the language of this nation, if you're entitled to free treatment on the nhs you probably ought to be able to speak it.
 
I'm not an expert, but I say more money would be saved if no translation services were provided on the nhs. English is the language of this nation, if you're entitled to free treatment on the nhs you probably ought to be able to speak it.

holiday makers? would you expect to be outcast if you had an accident abroad in a country where you dont speak the language?
 
It's DM, article has no credibility. Even so, what do you propose to do about it? How are you expected to diagnose a patient if you can't ask them about their symptoms?
 
It's DM, article has no credibility. Even so, what do you propose to do about it? How are you expected to diagnose a patient if you can't ask them about their symptoms?

The DM didn't commission the report though did they.

Still it is easier to lambaste the DM and me rather than debate the issue.
 
It's DM, article has no credibility. Even so, what do you propose to do about it? How are you expected to diagnose a patient if you can't ask them about their symptoms?
Or ask them to consent to treatment.

Maybe surgeons should just point scalpels at them and say 'ME-DI-CINE' loudly and slowly.
 
Why can't the NHS just charge for translations, tourists could maybe have this as part of their travel insurance. If you are a citizen and you can't communicate your symptoms then maybe a nominal fee for a translation can be paid via a translation insurance, just till you learn the language. It saves the NHS a bit of money, which sounds good to me.
 
because to be able to communicate is a fundamental right. waiting for a translation insurance broker to get a translator to an emergency department just wouldnt work.


not that the current system is super speedy atm...its needs a vast overhaul.
 
So purely based on the perception of the newspaper you formed your opinion.

Yup. Well, that and my prior knowledge of you ;)

Why can't the NHS just charge for translations, tourists could maybe have this as part of their travel insurance. If you are a citizen and you can't communicate your symptoms then maybe a nominal fee for a translation can be paid via a translation insurance, just till you learn the language. It saves the NHS a bit of money, which sounds good to me.

Except it probably wouldn't save any money due to the administration costs of such a system and goes completely against the basic principles that make the NHS so valuable in the first place.
 
Back
Top Bottom