Man of Honour
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 47,230
You sure about that jake? 20 races? lol 

Oh yeah I forgot, what's happened to HRT, race or no Race? Or no comment by FIA yet?
Oh yeah I forgot, what's happened to HRT, race or no Race? Or no comment by FIA yet?
Odd considering that it's the rear wing which is suspected to hide their secrets - with the passive F-duct hole exposed by the DRS, which then stalls the lower rear wing beam.I did think Schumi was taking extra care to handle his front wing when he came off.
Odd considering that it's the rear wing which is suspected to hide their secrets - with the passive F-duct hole exposed by the DRS, which then stalls the lower rear wing beam.
As far as I understand it anyway.
Odd considering that it's the rear wing which is suspected to hide their secrets - with the passive F-duct hole exposed by the DRS, which then stalls the lower rear wing beam.
As far as I understand it anyway.
That's basically what has happened. They are shell-shocked - no doubt about it.
Before the race they were claiming that they did not do a single low fuel run, at any stage so far (which, I do not believe). Horner was saying that he was comfortable where he was, so I think they felt that they had a competitive car which could compete at the front.
Like you said 6 tenths off the pace is massive.
Of course they have (during the Winter).
What generally happens is a team will bring new parts to every race (weekend). They test them out during the practise sessions, THEN if they like the new part, they decide to use it in the race.
What I am suggesting, is that in order to speed up development they can use the races as glorified test sessions. In otherwords, rather than wasting time fighting for 1pt, they can kit both cars out with different experimental parts and test them during the race. If need be (and if possible), mid race, they can switch these parts out with other experimental pieces. This way, when they leave the race, they shall have more data to work with and this "should" speed up development.
Bear in mind though, that if they decide to do this, they may be regularly finishing 1+ laps down on the rest of the field and there is also the reliability aspect - the experimental parts may break during the race.
My way of thinking is that Ferrari need to concentrate on developing their car - move it forward - and not worry about individual race results or points. Develop the car, so that next year, they have a great package to work from (as a starting point).
Ferrari must do something radical, if they are to go for the title in 2013, assuming that 2012 is a write-off.
Odd considering that it's the rear wing which is suspected to hide their secrets - with the passive F-duct hole exposed by the DRS, which then stalls the lower rear wing beam.
As far as I understand it anyway.
Just watching bbc highlights new commentator is awful
Just watching bbc highlights new commentator is awful