Well I'm glad to see that they've included instructions for the future!

Why don't we just change the name of this sub forum from General Discussion to Daily Mail article discussions...
 
What I don't understand is how 16 images were shown. Were people just sat there watching going 'I'm not sure this is right..... wait, there's another, it can't be a mistake... and another... is anyone going to say something about this? I mean, there's a kid here... oh, actually, that one's alright... you know what? I'm into it now...'.
 
What I don't understand is how 16 images were shown. Were people just sat there watching going 'I'm not sure this is right..... wait, there's another, it can't be a mistake... and another... is anyone going to say something about this? I mean, there's a kid here... oh, actually, that one's alright... you know what? I'm into it now...'.

Autoplay might have been set to open the folder. Throw in a folder set to 'thumbnail view' with thumbnails at a reasonable size, and... BAM! 16 photos of naked men all at once.

Not that I would know...
 
If the article is so awful why post it?


As for the images....it is likely someone decided that it would be funny to plant the images and set the autoplay.
 
Yeah, its so funny watching a mans reputation and subsequently his life being destroyed before his guilt has even been ascertained.
 
If the article is so awful why post it?


As for the images....it is likely someone decided that it would be funny to plant the images and set the autoplay.

Agree, some scrot has probably placed it there. If not who really cares anyway, the pictures weren't illegal.
 
Back
Top Bottom