Birds from Liverpool 2012

I will not be posting a picture of myself. However if it helps.. I'm balding, late 30s, overweight and my eyes are like **** holes in the snow. I'm pleased to say that I'm not pale, thanks to my jaundice.

Why does my appearance matter though? As I've said you don't need to be a an artist to be a critic.

It doesn't, I just thought it would be a fun thing to do.
 
If it helps I could find a picture of some forever alone disaster and pretend it's me? It's going to be a bit shallow, because these days google search by image exposes any of those attempts, plus I'm right this minute telling you I'm going to do it, so you may very well spot it.
 
If it helps I could find a picture of some forever alone disaster and pretend it's me? It's going to be a bit shallow, because these days google search by image exposes any of those attempts, plus I'm right this minute telling you I'm going to do it, so you may very well spot it.

I think you should
 
I think I missed some of the previous posts so colour me Switzerland. If not everyone is onboard with the post a picture/laugh at a picture idea then it won't work.
 
[FnG]magnolia;21673463 said:
Ladies, enough.

Post your best pic and then post a pic of the DM girls you don't think look great.

That's it.

:D

You made the comment of us being "vampire pale technology geeks" and you want us to post pictures of ourselves to leave ourselves open to potential ridicule and turn the tables because of what we said about these women, your intentions are completely transparent. I'll give you your ammo to insult me, but first you must be open to it yourself, unless you're worried or ashamed of yourself.

It was that guy Magnolia that first suggested getting the fine, prince charming's of the forum to post their pictures, but hey ho, your beef is with me.

I'm not worried nor concerned, as I'm not the one ****ging off women on the internet, that would be you, you beautiful hunk.

Making assumptions of people you don't even know or have never seen is even more lol-worthy than us talking about these women, at least we have some base for talking about them, you have none, you're tarring everyone with the same brush foolishly and trying to do exactly the same as what we are which makes you no better, it just makes you a hypocrite.

Making assumptions? or just reading their posts?

No, it's not 'more lol-worthy' then an internet forum, and the Daily Fail talking about women. C'mon you just said; that northern women are ugly? You just called northern men, wife beaters. C'mon, but I'm the hypocrite for picking you all up on this level of stella standard posting.

Oh no, Tummy just called people that post on an internet forum pale, I shall however win this argument by calling northern men wife beats and northern women ugly.

Jesus, how horrifying.

Why are northern women so ugly? Did their husbands punch them in the face too many times?


Lets do it, man. Don't be scared, it's just the internet.

You're the one talking about these 'horrifying' women, not me, I'm merely defending (as others have done) that there is nothing wrong with women dressing up and going for a day out. I've said it's wrong, to do what you've been doing though, and it's wrong of the Daily Fail.

I think it would have been better, all things considered, if you'd in some way had your argument make reference to mine. I know it's a bit passe to follow standard form, but in some cases I find it helps in a discussion if both parties at least attempt to listen to the other. On the other hand if you're intent on winning an argument, and not letting little nuisances like the facts or who is right get in the way, then listening is indeed completely counter productive.

What facts are these you speak of?

C'mon, it's 'okay' to **** people off from the safety of the internet.
It's not okay to **** them off to their face?
It's okay to be nice to people though, to their face.
It's okay to make derogatory comments about women, who's only 'crime' is to put effort in to making themselves look 'good'.

I don't deny being a hypocrite either, I just don't need the self satisfaction or ego boost of telling the internet that a bunch of women aren't up to my incredibly high standards.
 
[FnG]magnolia;21673489 said:
I think I missed some of the previous posts so colour me Switzerland. If not everyone is onboard with the post a picture/laugh at a picture idea then it won't work.

Sure, you go first, and I'll happily follow. :cool: But I think it'll be easier if I post the ones who I do find attractive, there's only 2 or 3.
 
C'mon you just said; that northern women are ugly? You just called northern men, wife beaters. C'mon, but I'm the hypocrite for picking you all up on this level of stella standard posting.

Oh no, Tummy just called people that post on an internet forum pale, I shall however win this argument by calling northern men wife beats and northern women ugly.

Hahaha wow, you took my trolling seriously, that's hilarious.

Still waiting on you to post up your pic, Tummy.
I thought you were going to bed?
 
If you back track hard enough, you'll be able to post something funny.

Who's back tracking? The wife beater comment was the trolling part, 80% of the women in that link are still atrocious, which is what you're butthurt about.
 
C'mon, it's 'okay' to **** people off from the safety of the internet.
It's not okay to **** them off to their face?
I don't think that's under any kind of disagreement is it?
It's okay to be nice to people though, to their face.
Nor is that.
It's okay to make derogatory comments about women, who's only 'crime' is to put effort in to making themselves look 'good'.
What's a derogatory comment? That I don't think they're looking their best? I think the combination of what they're wearing, their fake bake, make-up and hair makes them look far worse than they potentially should? Is that derogatory? If it is then, yes, it is ok to say it. However derogatory comments would be more along the lines of someone's permanent physical features, and I don't feel particularly comfortable there.
I don't deny being a hypocrite either, I just don't need the self satisfaction or ego boost of telling the internet that a bunch of women aren't up to my incredibly high standards.

It's still got nothing to do with the internet. I'll do it in a restaurant, in a train station, at work, on holiday, on a date, wherever I happen to be. I enjoy discussing other stranger's appearance with other people - be it to say I find it aesthetically pleasing or be it to say I don't. I think a great number of people do, and there's nothing wrong with it, and it doesn't need an internet white knight coming to the rescue.
 

Back tracking would be taking back what I said about the women originally (Which I didn't) which was the intent of the thread, the trolling part of my first post was the wife beater comment, you took it as if I was actually calling them wife beaters (Which I wasn't, hence trolled.)

I'm disappointed Tummy, after all of this you still don't have the balls to post 1 picture of yourself.
 
Back tracking would be taking back what I said about the women originally (Which I didn't) which was the intent of the thread, the trolling part of my first post was the wife beater comment, you took it as if I was actually calling them wife beaters (Which I wasn't, hence trolled.)

You keep telling yourself that ;)

I'm disappointed Tummy, after all of this you still don't have the balls to post 1 picture of yourself.

If you're that desperate, go look in the 'post a picture of yourself' thread :)
 
Back
Top Bottom