Was that supposed to mean something?
Yes, that your post was rubbish....but with a c word.
Was that supposed to mean something?
snipped
I'm not disputing that but you will ALWAYS have children who don't want to be there and as such will not respect the teacher, EVERYBODY IS UNIQUE we cannot change this. You have good eggs and bad eggs you just have to get on with it. That's why I think respect is a two-way street. We should all be treated evenly.
I think becoming a teacher is enough to earn respect from the children that they are teaching.
At my secondary school we were made to stand when a teacher entered the classroom, I thought that was common?
Maybe as a nation we should look at why they don't want to be there. I think it's due to complete lack of interest. If maybe rather then going back to Grammar schools, you set up a less academic school, focus on teaching trades to the people that are less academic, therefore leaving the schools free to teach the more promising academics, you may end up with a good standard of both education and skilled workers.
But surely at least attempting to instil a bit of discipline into these children would be a start?
I think there is some validity in kids who don't have an academic side to them being taught practical trades, but I also know that some kids simply don't want to learn anything be it practical or academic and often the kids who are most disruptive are not always lacking in eduction ability, they are simply disruptive.
This is what crash test dummies were invented for.....in the un PC world of Housey at least.
Yes, that your post was rubbish....but with a c word.
The school should be focussing on the students academics not their discilpine.
really? in my opinion they should also be focusing on discipline manners and other important life skills, so they are more prepared for life after education.The school should be focussing on the students academics not their discilpine.
Maybe as a nation we should look at why they don't want to be there. I think it's due to complete lack of interest. If maybe rather then going back to Grammar schools, you set up a less academic school, focus on teaching trades to the people that are less academic, therefore leaving the schools free to teach the more promising academics, you may end up with a good standard of both education and skilled workers.
What about scientists, doctor, those who actually did more work to get their degree, do you stand up when they enter the room? Didn't think so.
The school should be focussing on the students academics not their discilpine.
You can't just use a swear word as an argument. Please enlighten me.
You can't just use a swear word as an argument. Please enlighten me.
But surely at least attempting to instil a bit of discipline into these children would be a start?
Giving up on them to the detriment of others is just sad.
I started primary school in 1991 and left school altogether in 2003, and noticed a massive change in pupil behaviour in the last 3 or 4 years I was there (mostly negative.)
So having two types of school? One for academic studies and one for trade type studies.
After mandatory school that is what happens at the moment, college or sixth form as it seems. Having this all the way up the education system is not a bad idea, however having some core subjects there should always be the case, basic maths + english skills should ALWAYS be teaught. It's needed everywhere in life.
really? in my opinion they should also be focusing on discipline manners and other important life skills, so they are more prepared for life after education.
Yeah you could fork off at say just after primary or maybe in the third year secondary, when you normally take your options, you could plump for a trade maybe, start at that age then become an apprentice but with a good amount of knowledge behind you.