as of yet but if there is then it is assumed that this would be the place to find it since temperatures are neither too hot nor too cold for liquid water to exist on any would be planet's surface.There is no evidence. Planets, even in habitual zone with water
I suppose the alleged abundancey of water in space is placed in to perspective by this:
Around a black hole 12 billion light years away, there's an almost unimaginable vapor cloud of water--enough to supply an entire planet's worth of water for every person on earth, 20,000 times over.
If we are looking for the chances of life then we should start simply by searching for the ingrediants and conditions that led to there being life here. There is no real need to extrapolate statistically the chances of anything since all we have to do is keep searching and developing the processes that will enable us to do it/find life. It will all become self-evident eventually. For the record I am not suggesting we are arguing about anything regarding thisAgain your missing the point I'm not arguing about planets or what we have found, or what either of us think.
At it's most basic.
Number if planets x chance of life = number of planets that should have life on it.
planets or what we have found, or what either of us think.
Last edited:




just like the earth that used to be considered massive and take many months if not years to travel and now we can be on the other side in less than a single day