Yet Another pakistani sex gang in rochdale.

This thread has just turned to pointless bickering. Can we honestly not get along any more and be objective about our discussion? Why be so hostile to each other?

I agree, infact I would love to see these topics banned from OCUK (please do ban them!). But I have to say that the statistics are worrying on this issue.
 
If 4% of the population are from Southern Asia, how are 6% of the population Pakistani, being as Pakistan would just be part of that 4%?

who mentioned Pakistan?:confused:

cheets said:
The last thread someone posted that 6% of the country is made up of Asian people but 75% of reported rape gangs is by Asians.
 
infact I would love to see these topics banned from OCUK (please do ban them!).

YES! Ban the truth!

Crush free speech and free thought!

You are a sadly typical of the endless masses who have had their minds owned since birth.

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH! HAIL BIG BROTHER!
 
who mentioned Pakistan?:confused:

You quoted 'thatasianguy' who refered to the prejorative of Pakistani.....

Even given the wider South Asian community, given the influx of Eastern Europeans I suspect while the population has gotten significant larger, the percentage is fairly static overall....
 
You quoted 'thatasianguy' who refered to the prejorative of Pakistani.....

Even given the wider South Asian community, given the influx of Eastern Europeans I suspect while the population has gotten significant larger, the percentage is fairly static overall....

well yeah but he quoted cheets, just because he chose to change Asian to "PAKIZ" din;t suddenly mean cheets was saying 6% of the population were from Pakistan did it?

guess we'll see the % wqhen the data fro mthe 2011 census is out.
 
Last edited:
YES! Ban the truth!

Crush free speech and free thought!

You are a sadly typical of the endless masses who have had their minds owned since birth.

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH! HAIL BIG BROTHER!

They want them banned because nothing ever comes of them. The prejudiced people will continue to spot nonsense and the people with enough patience will fruitlessly try to reason with them.

Funny how you seem to think that the government want to turn you against immigrants, when they're the ones with the capability to do something about it.
 
They want them banned because nothing ever comes of them. .

nothing ever comes from any threads on here.

hell even the ones that are funny stories we never get closure on.

it's GD, general discussion the intended purpose of the section is to talk **** at each other to fill time that we'd otherwise have to use in a productive way and frankly that sounds like a far more troublesome alternative.
 
well yeah but he quoted cheets, just because he chose to change Asian to "PAKIZ" din;t suddenly mean cheets was saying 6% of the population were from Pakistan did it?

No, but it might have been helpful to quote Cheets as well, or explain that was who you were refering to.

However, to further support your and cheets figures, I found an article that states that the Asian population of England and Wales is 5.87%. The data is dated 2010.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/may/18/ethnic-population-england-wales

I stand corrected....or is that corrupted!
 
Those boys must be sick in the head to do that like the serial killer in The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo.
It is truly horrific what goes on.

it's times like that i think we should hire whoever magick says secretly brought the WTC down with a controlled demolition to do the same on every tower block in the country....
 
No, but it might have been helpful to quote Cheets as well, or explain that was who you were refering to.

However, to further support your and cheets figures, I found an article that states that the Asian population of England and Wales is 5.87%. The data is dated 2010.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/may/18/ethnic-population-england-wales

5.87 is pretty close, i was sure i had heard about six before.

I don't think to reference cheets but I thought it would have been obvious given thatasianguys post and the quote in it.
 
I must say though that i do feel a little sense of "it would just be easier if we didn't let any one them into the country without a very good reason".

Probably not the best attitude but it certainly seems an easier fix.

yes there are natives who do terrible things but we don't really have the option of stopping them being here before they do anything.

If we had it so that to get here you needed to be coming in as a skilled employee of a major company that procures your visa for you (because they cannot fill the role with a suitable native candidate) and any crime = straight back wherever you came from and we turned down all asylum-seekers saying they can claim asylum in France or whatever EU country they last came from and send them back to that.

yes we'd lose a lot of good people but arguably we'd not let in a lot of the bad too.

The more stuff like this seems to come out the more and more the "don't let them in" ideology seems to make sense.

any input on this cas?

I'm not normally one of the "send them back brigade" but there is a sort of easy comfort in the "keep them out" philosophy given recent events.
 
[FnG]magnolia;21903147 said:
This post and your sig are unintentionally comedy gold.

Good for you kid. Ron Paul is the only man who wants to end a foreign-occupied private central bank which uses the money of decent people to fund foreign interests and speculator parasites/banks.

Nobody with an education would bash the man.
 
Back
Top Bottom