*** The 2012 Gym Rats Thread ***

Status
Not open for further replies.
Legs:

Squats -
60x10
80x10
100x8
120x6

Box squats, box let me go to parallel -
140x5
150x3
160x3
170x3
180x2 - form started to suffer so decided to stop here

Front squats-
5x5x60kg. Nothing much but fast reps, banged them out ATG.

By this point I needed to sit down, so took the weak way out and did Iso seated leg curls
50kg each leg 3x10

Leg extensions iso machine
60kg each leg 3x10

Seated calf raises
130kg 3x15


Getting there, enjoyed this workout wish all were like it!
 
Last edited:
Monster benching PK :cool:

I managed to hit 40kg DBP for 8 tonight for the first time in a few years (since shoulder injury) but now feel puny :o
 
Have a play around with this *******: http://bwsimulator.niddk.nih.gov/


This Math Equation Will Make You Less Fat

From trying fad diets to developing eating disorders to becoming a gym rat, people have basically gone crazy trying to lose weight. And it's true, America is fat. But what if the secret to losing weight wasn't in ditching carbs or hurling or doing interval exercises but rather if it was in math? What? Yes. Math.

It's simple. Just punch in your vitals into this model, plug in the weight you want to end up at x-amount of days and the equation will tell you how many calories you need to eat moving forward. The magic of math!

The model was created by Carson C. Chow, an investigator at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, to figure out America's weight problem (1 in 3 Americans are overweight). He created a formula that can accurately predict how much weight a person will gain or lose depending on their caloric intake and activity level. It's a specific numeric value to eating less. According to Chow, he considered multiple factors for his formula:

"The conventional wisdom of 3,500 calories less is what it takes to lose a pound of weight is wrong. The body changes as you lose. Interestingly, we also found that the fatter you get, the easier it is to gain weight. An extra 10 calories a day puts more weight onto an obese person than on a thinner one.

Also, there's a time constant that's an important factor in weight loss. That's because if you reduce your caloric intake, after a while, your body reaches equilibrium. It actually takes about three years for a dieter to reach their new "steady state." Our model predicts that if you eat 100 calories fewer a day, in three years you will, on average, lose 10 pounds - if you don't cheat."


Also, according to Chow, huge variations in your daily food intake won't dramatically change your weight as long as the average caloric intake over a year is the same. A person's body takes time to respond, you know.

And for Chow's theory on why America got fat? We have too much food. The increase in per capita food supply coincides with the rise in obesity. More food means fatter people. Test out Chow's fat losing equation here to know how many (or how few) calories you need to eat to get to your desired weight.
http://gizmodo.com/5910578/this-math-equation-will-make-you-less-fat
 
I wouldn't. Unless you have a specific need to train your neck. That's just my opinion. You have to use exceptionally perfect form to use a neck harness.
 
Squat form was starting to break today, so going to keep at 95kg until I get it nailed again.

Squats - 95kg
OHP - 65kg (getting tough again).
Deadlift - 130kg (Something didnt feel right about them even though I have no back pain etc, it just felt hard getting it off the floor).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom