7970 + bf3

[vonex]

But why? I assume in the first instance you have a monitor capable of 100FPS?

I guarantee you one thing, if you were tested on the difference you can see between 60 / 80 / 100 FPS you would have a hell of a job noticing any difference on BF3.

regardless of this argument, should my system be able to pull 100fps with my rig and stated res and settings?

 

[spixelspixel]

BF3 and CSS are a million miles apart.

If I ever get around to playing bf3, chances are I'd play it on low settings like op so don't see anything odd about it tbh. I prefer higher more stable fps over graphics.

 

[dave_beast]

regardless of this argument, should my system be able to pull 100fps with my rig and stated res and settings?

Did you see my post?

Just run BF3 Caspian Border 64 player, 2 minute benchmark, all settings on low, MSAAx2, SSAO, 85fov, vsync off 1920x1080:-

Min 103 Max 137 Avg 116.5

There's something awry on your system then.

 

[vonex]

If I ever get around to playing bf3, chances are I'd play it on low settings like op so don't see anything odd about it tbh. I prefer higher more stable fps over graphics.

+1

 

[vonex]

Did you see my post?

i'll run it using the same settings see what i come back with.

 

[vonex]

Yeah.

The other day I tried running The Witcher 2 on just high settings. I only got 43 FPS. I then did Ultra and was getting 50-55.

interesting i'll give it ago.

 

[vonex]

Just run BF3 Caspian Border 64 player, 2 minute benchmark, all settings on low, MSAAx2, SSAO, 85fov, vsync off 1920x1080:-

Min 103 Max 137 Avg 116.5

There's something awry on your system then.

i take it you just played for 2mins yeah ?

 

[dave_beast]

i take it you just played for 2mins yeah ?

Yes, spawned at B on Conquest large and ran around for a while towards D up the hill, started the Fraps benchmark after about 20 secs in game

 

[vonex]

very similar min fps how ever its not the map which i was getting low fps on - if you get abit free time try it on gulf of oman and report back

2012-05-16 15:36:27 - bf3
Frames: 18897 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 157.475 - Min: 109 - Max: 200

 

[dave_beast]

very similar min fps how ever its not the map which i was getting low fps on - if you get abit free time try it on gulf of oman and report back

2012-05-16 15:36:27 - bf3
Frames: 18897 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 157.475 - Min: 109 - Max: 200

Yes mate, will do that this evening. Assuming your fps are higher due to a higher overclock?

 

[vonex]

Yes mate, will do that this evening. Assuming your fps are higher due to a higher overclock?

i guess so buddy

 

[Besty]

its not about ganing an advantage, my main objective is to have 100fps constant when playing online

Hey mate, I play like you do, its the only way

Edit.

I get about 80-150fps in single card mode. 7970 1300/1800 clock.

 

[dave_beast]

Op has a single card

 

[Besty]

Op has a single card

its been a rough day.

 

[Krono5]

I wish I could get an advantage by playing on low but in BF3 it seems like a disadvantage and you can't see anything at all.

As for seeing the difference between 60 and 80 fps thats very slight but still notiecable, 60 fps and 120 on the other hand? Night and day.

 

[dave_beast]

very similar min fps how ever its not the map which i was getting low fps on - if you get abit free time try it on gulf of oman and report back

2012-05-16 15:36:27 - bf3
Frames: 18897 - Time: 120000ms - Avg: 157.475 - Min: 109 - Max: 200

Any specific place on the map I should hang around?

 

[vonex]

where ever m8, just report back, i get similar fps on karkand

 

[oldestgregg]

its been a rough day.

+1

 

[ince]

Shame having such a good card and playing on low.

 

[Westie]

Karkland maps do decrease in fps a lot even on top end cards its not u its the game!