FPN to increase to £90 and include careless driving

i don't understand the undertaking laws can anyone clarify?

if im in traffic on the motorway and the inside lane is moving more freely than the middle or outside lane then should i be able to drive past them on the left or do i have to match their speed even if they could move to the inside themselves and speed up?

To me that's simply passing on the left and keeping up with the flow of traffic, surely not a problem.

Undertaking would be deliberately going out of your way to move over to the left and pass cars, then moving back over which is a problem.
 
To me that's simply passing on the left and keeping up with the flow of traffic, surely not a problem.

Undertaking would be deliberately going out of your way to move over to the left and pass cars, then moving back over which is a problem.

The Highway Code does not reference 'undertaking', it says 'Pass on the right'.
 
I was under the impression passing on the left was only acceptable in heavy traffic on the basis that if people refused to 'undertake' when the left lane moved forward you'd just create complete bedlam.

Flying down the inside of someone at 90mph because they're in the middle lane doesn't count I don't think :p

268

Do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake.
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;22152742 said:
The Highway Code does not reference 'undertaking', it says 'Pass on the right'.

Indeed, but the point still remains as Kenai's quote of the highway code points out. I should have clarified the passing on the left as only being deemed acceptable in traffic. Anyone going out of their way to pass on the left is in the wrong.
 
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.u...tographer-wins-police-payout-over-lawful-pics

When this kind of idiocy is a daily occurrence within the Police force, I don't want them being able to give out points and a fine for what they see as dangerous driving.

Let us also not forget when the Police really get it wrong and just flat out murder innocent people, and get away with it.

"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty." - Thomas Jefferson

Funny how the people with mindsets like that always feel the need to post quotes.
 
Funny how the people with mindsets like that always feel the need to post quotes.

Yes, truly the idea that greater more experienced minds than I could come up with much better turns of phrase and literary works than I probably ever will is the hight of comedy??

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
 
Sounds like a brilliant idea, something seriously needs to be done with lane discipline in this country it's shocking, also the amount of braking on motorways is beyond retarded. I'm fairly sure the majority of the motoring public focus only on the car directly in front of them whilst driving.

I also think anyone caught with a satnav stuck within the MOT screen chip fail zone should receive points and a fine.
 
Don't the Police make enough money?.

LOL, fines don't get paid into police coffers :rolleyes:




You deny police incompetence is not a daily occurance?

Of course it happens on a daily basis just like any other job. Next you will be saying not to go for that urgent life-saving hospital operation and quoting figures of the amount of people that die during said operations :rolleyes:


"better to remain silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt" - Abraham Lincoln and others :p
 
Last edited:
Of course it happens on a daily basis just like any other job. Next you will be saying not to go for that urgent life-saving hospital operation and quoting figures of the amount of people that die during said operations :rolleyes:

At least in the case of medical staff incompetency and/or abuse of power is fairly easy to contest. In this situation the courts are nearly always going to side with the Police officer unless you have irrefutable evidence to prove otherwise.

I've said it before in threads like this, and I'll say it again. I do not like nor do I trust the Police force and I think anybody who is happy giving them more power that cannot be fairly contested in a court of law is woefully naive.
 
Are you talking from a point of experience (personal or other documented evidence) with loads of cases where it is 1 cop's word against someone else's and the courts just take the cop's word as fact or is it just hyperbole?

As for giving them more power - it is not really. If you don't accept that you did anything wrong then don't pay the ticket and have your day in court (should the CPS/PF proceed). This "new" method is just to stop things going to court that don't need to i.e. where the accused is happy to plead guilty by means of paying a fixed penalty. It also frees up the cop to do more policing given that they now don't have to spend hours preparing casework.
 
Back
Top Bottom