I think it would a a rubbish decision to bin Carroll off.
Why?
Because of the Euro's and the last few matches of the prem, he is at his highest value in all his time at Liverpool.
He doesn't look like a Rodgers style player,...why keep him?
I think it would a a rubbish decision to bin Carroll off.
Fabio Capello confirmed as new Russia coach.
One potential outside reason is, why I said Utd are going for Baines, when you have a 25 man squad but can only have 17 non home grown, it is very important to have the other 8 slots filled, even more so when you're playing in Europe as well as two domestic cups and the league.
I can't see MU having any problem whatsoever with finding the 8 players to make up the numbers (note the below aren't in any particular order and not suggesting all would necessarily be good enough for the 25 man squad, also some qualify as young players anyway I think so would replace Giggs/Scholes when they are no longer selected):
Rio
Evans
Carrick
Scholes
Giggs
Rooney
Smalling
Cleverley
Jones
Rafael
Fabio
Wellbeck
Macheda
etc

I can't see MU having any problem whatsoever with finding the 8 players to make up the numbers (note the below aren't in any particular order and not suggesting all would necessarily be good enough for the 25 man squad, also some qualify as young players anyway I think so would replace Giggs/Scholes when they are no longer selected):
Rio
Evans
Carrick
Scholes
Giggs
Rooney
Smalling
Cleverley
Jones
Rafael
Fabio
Wellbeck
Macheda
etc
It's not HOW MANY players you have but HOW GOOD they are.
Fabio and Rafael aren't very good defenders, Wellbeck and Macheda aren't good strikers, Rio is one back injury recurrence from having his career be over, Scholes and Giggs are a broken hip away from retiring(they're old see).
You misread the point COMPLETELY.
It's not HOW MANY players you have but HOW GOOD they are.
Wow, that was unnecessarily rude.
Wow, that was unnecessarily rude.
Nearly every single post he makes is, be it about whatever club.
It's the main issue I take with the posts, often there is some useful information or something interesting within it but it's either totally rude or a post stating that his opinion is fact, it's quite grating and saddening that he has to be so rude to try and get his point across.
I dont post particularly often, but i do 'lurk' a fair bit and this is hardly surprising is it? The DM reply must have CAPS EMPHASIS.
It's off: Chelsea end talks on Oscar: http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/7904837/Chelsea-end-Oscar-talks
It's on: Chelsea agree £25M deal for Oscar: http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/7904965/Oscar-deal-done
all in the space of 2hrs? someone writing these stories is taking the ****

Less than 2 hours there was less than 20 minutes between those two links
Anyone know anything about this Oscar lad then? What position does he play in?
I was going by the transfer news tickers and clockwatches, times on the stories are the latest editsLess than 2 hours there was less than 20 minutes between those two links![]()
some good detailed analysis of him here: http://brazil.worldcupblog.org/world-cup-2010/the-playmakers-oscar.htmlAnyone know anything about this Oscar lad then? What position does he play in?
It's off: Chelsea end talks on Oscar: http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/7904837/Chelsea-end-Oscar-talks
It's on: Chelsea agree £25M deal for Oscar: http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/7904965/Oscar-deal-done
all in the space of 2hrs? someone writing these stories is taking the ****
