There's a reason no one uses Opera, even though it's free. It's a good idea that just can't cope with todays web.Does Chrome use Cleartype? Because what I'm looking at looks EXACTLY the same as your IE screenprint
There's a reason no one uses Opera, even though it's free. It's a good idea that just can't cope with todays web.Does Chrome use Cleartype? Because what I'm looking at looks EXACTLY the same as your IE screenprint
outlook.com = stupid mode activated.
expect even stupid people know better.
I know its old hat to some, but has anyone else had problems with windows live messenger" since moving to outlook.com. I've even tried adding new people buts its not working.
That's because you have ClearType enabled at the OS level. It's an abomination of a system that should die in a fire.
If I wanted muddy, blurry and crappy looking fonts all over my OS I would leave it enabled.
But you said ClearType was 'enforced' on IE only so it'll look crap on other browsers. Now you're saying it's an OS thing, which is it?
And your second paragraph seems odd to me, I've never seen 'muddy, blurry and crappy looking fonts' on my current 'ClearType enforced' system.
Onstantly
Yes I'm old school and its my main change client and its been
borked since they rebranded adding nnew people doesn't work and I've been disconnected all day yesterday
Tablet fail
I only use hotmail when I have to, In typical MS fashion they can attempt to update the frontend but the backend still works like it did 10 years ago which is not a good thing.Well that's a well thought out argument. It's ironic that you, well if I can successfully interpret what you are saying, label people as stupid for using it then come out with grammatical errors suggesting that you are stupid - so you must be using it then?
With regards to cleartype - I have to say that on Firefox mine looks exactly like IE. Have you disabled Cleartype on your system? This is the only explanation I can think of.
M.
But you said ClearType was 'enforced' on IE only so it'll look crap on other browsers. Now you're saying it's an OS thing, which is it?
And your second paragraph seems odd to me, I've never seen 'muddy, blurry and crappy looking fonts' on my current 'ClearType enforced' system.
Derp a Herp a Derp.
ClearType is an OS level setting. It's forced in IE no matter what the OS is set to. IE applies ClearType no matter what, you cannot disable it.
If you have it enabled at OS level it will ALSO apply to other browsers.
It's really simple.
Cleartype on any half decent monitor is not required, it does nothing to clear up fonts on a modern monitor and only serves to make stuff less sharp than it should be. It's a foul system.
Derp a Herp a Derp.
ClearType is an OS level setting. It's forced in IE no matter what the OS is set to. IE applies ClearType no matter what, you cannot disable it.
If you have it enabled at OS level it will ALSO apply to other browsers.
It's really simple.
Cleartype on any half decent monitor is not required, it does nothing to clear up fonts on a modern monitor and only serves to make stuff less sharp than it should be. It's a foul system.

Looks fine on my iPad in chrome and Safari... you sure you don't need glasses?The fonts outlook.com uses are utterly terrible for screen display when they are not harassed by cleartype, as per the screen-shot I posted comparing ClearTyped fonts in IE to Non-ClearTyped fonts in other browsers. The world does not run on Windows (Hello mobile devices, Unix, OSX and everyone else) so designing a website and using a font that looks terrible without cleartype is such a stupid design choice.



Oh, whilst we're talking about being clueless, according to this months Marketshare data, Opera Mobile has just 9% of the mobile market behind Safari at 66% and Android at 20% (as well as 1.6% of desktop market and 2.3% overall combined, so to all intents and purposes, irrelevant). Not even close to being the "biggest mobile browser market share".Clearly you are absolutely clueless, seeing as opera has one of the, if not the biggest mobile browser market share.

Oh my good god.
ClearType is an OS level setting. If you enable it at OS level it is enabled on everything.
IE uses ClearType no matter what you set at the OS level. IE will always have ClearType fonts when the OS ClearType is disabled while other browsers, as per the OS setting will not have any ClearType applied at all.
It's so utterly basic a concept to understand.
The fonts outlook.com uses are utterly terrible for screen display when they are not harassed by cleartype, as per the screen-shot I posted comparing ClearTyped fonts in IE to Non-ClearTyped fonts in other browsers. The world does not run on Windows (Hello mobile devices, Unix, OSX and everyone else) so designing a website and using a font that looks terrible without cleartype is such a stupid design choice.
Oh, whilst we're talking about being clueless, according to this months Marketshare data, Opera Mobile has just 9% of the mobile market behind Safari at 66% and Android at 20% (as well as 1.6% of desktop market and 2.3% overall combined, so to all intents and purposes, irrelevant). Not even close to being the "biggest mobile browser market share".
http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/worldwide-mobile-2012-07.png
Your aggressive attitude in this thread has frankly just left you looking a little foolish. Still, on the bright side it's not about anythng particualrly important so all good fun![]()
![]()
My question is why are you only bringing this up now and not before when you posted that screenshot to someone who said they hadn't experienced any issue with their Firefox? Why didn't you say THEN it had nothing to do with their browser and was OS enforced and saved yourself posting a screen grab?
I think you've only learnt about the "enforced OS cleartype" thing AFTER your initial posts here and now you're trying to make out that's what you saying all along.
Those stats are not representative of un-bias, unweighted data available online.
Just what does that image report on, which regions, which "mobile" devices and what weighting is applied? Does it filter out bogus data? Etc Etc. Just posting an image with no actual description is pretty useless.