I said it before, Chelsea simply used us to get Benny back to form/fitness after a bad injury. Sahin is incredibly highly rated, he had a great season before going Real, and a team like Real doesn't have space to give someone 10 games to get back to preinjury form. Arsenal are being used(if we infact get him), its NOT in the interest of a team to potentially build an offence around a player for a season just to see him leave. A loan can help for a big team, more to cover an injury than to be the difference between winning/losing a league.
What do Utd do if they get Sahin, the team gets to the stage its 100% dependant on him not to dissimilar to Scholes for all their attacking play, then he goes back to Real to be first team? you're MUCH better off bringing in a long term player to build a team off. Not only will you be in the same situation 12 months from now, that assumes he's actually any good. Re-injury risk after big injuries is big, form isn't certain(otherwise Real wouldn't loan him). The fact is, if he's any good Real will keep him, if he's not Real will look to offload him next year and you won't want him after a poor year. The upside is all Real's
Totally agree which is why we aren't ever interested in loaning other clubs players, still envious that you get him for a season though and who knows there's no guarantee that Real would be against selling him even if he does do brilliantly for Arsenal. I do wonder if Sahin to Arsenal is all resting on Real getting Modric though....