American white supremacist unable to tell the difference between Sikhs & Muslims?

So you make an OFF TOPIC, irrelavent and insinuating comment, which you were challanged on and im derailing the thread? Only one who seems buthurt is you since you cant just admit your comment was nonsense.

erm no.. I'm just responding to your repeated postings on the issue

Funny enough you accuse me of making assumtions when its what you have been doing all along, in respect to ASSUMING the murdered American Sikh's share the same view as your racist group of friends :D

the comment had nothing to do with the murdered american sikhs

I have all ready stated that i am aware the some Sikh and Muslim communities dont get along, but hey dont let the facts get in the way of your drivel.

you eventually did, you seemed completely incredulous to the fact earlier... in fact the comment that some did led you to your faux outrage in the first place

you really are just one oversensitive muslim trying to find something to take offence at even when you've drawn the wrong conclusions/made the wrong assumptions in the first place... you really should watch the 'militant black guy' clips...
 
Why is white supremacist used towards a racist white person yet not used against racist people of other races? if you look at crime statistics in the US there are far more black on white crimes but the media would have us believe we're out there picking on poor minorities.

Becuase the guy in question was a member of a white supremacist organisation and went out to kill non white people specifically.

And if for example of black panther member deove down to his local "white church" and shot everyone im sure he would be labled a "black supremacist" or some variant :rolleyes:
 
Becuase the guy in question was a member of a white supremacist organisation and went out to kill non white people specifically.

And if for example of black panther member deove down to his local "white church" and shot everyone im sure he would be labled a "black supremacist" or some variant :rolleyes:

Hmm well black on white hate crimes rarely get media attention it wouldn't shock me if such things happen they probably do in South Africa.
 
I know for a fact that a lot of people in this country would also look at a turban and call the wearer a four letter word beginning with P thinking they were Muslim.
Not just in America.


I can only speak for myself but I haven't met more friendly people than Sikhs'


The son of the guy (Sikh family) who has the local post office and works in there from time to time is one hell of a nice bloke. You look at him in his bandanna and tight fitting t-shirt and think MMA, this guy is enormous and in character a real gent. I really dread to think what he would unleash on anyone going in there and dropping the P-word and at the same time would relish seeing a bigot with no brain getting torn a new one.
 
What is it with Americans and guns? These people shouldn't be allowed to hold scissors, let alone guns :rolleyes:

Two things I thought was funny, that people think the white supremacists can't tell the difference, maybe they can, maybe they can't. THe clue is in the name, they are white supremacists, by definition they kinda hate everyone non white, and a huge portion of white people that aren't behind their idea's also.


does it surprise you most americans are pretty clueless on anything non american.(geography,other religion, etc)

Does it surprise you that most english people have no clue about other religions, geography, science, etc, etc. Uneducated people are the same worldwide, uneducated, even that is harsh. Can you name each and every country on the planet and point it out on a map instantly? If you can(I've never met a single english person, myself included, who can come close) then how has it improved your life, how does it improve your intelligence, how much time did it take you to learn, what do you not know that you could have learnt in that time anyway.

Intelligence is one thing, knowledge is completely another, judging people because they learnt different things to you is not a sign of intelligence.

Oh for the record on the day I read about this crime, I also read about

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/a...ng?utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=twitterfeed

Same day, I believe its 9 victims in a week being shot, the main difference being, they didn't die, not for want of trying. Gun crime isn't unique to america, they just seem much better at it.
 
Last edited:
erm no.. I'm just responding to your repeated postings on the issue

And vice versa


the comment had nothing to do with the murdered american sikhs

So the point of your comment was, it was in this thread wasnt it?

you eventually did, you seemed completely incredulous to the fact earlier... in fact the comment that some did led you to your faux outrage in the first place

Oh really, are you finding it difficult to keep up, as i stated to your 1st reply

I wasnt aware Sikh's generally dislike Muslims?

You know the generally bit

you really are just one oversensitive muslim trying to find something to take offence at even when you've drawn the wrong conclusions/made the wrong assumptions in the first place... you really should watch the 'militant black guy' clips...

Hey, why dont you mention im Muslim or an "ethnic" again, its not like you havent all ready stated it like 5x, but maybe someone missed it :rolleyes:

Not once have i feel the need to bring up you ethnicity or religion, but i guuess you need something to fall back on.
 
And if for example of black panther member deove down to his local "white church" and shot everyone im sure he would be labled a "black supremacist" or some variant :rolleyes:

yup

[flame bait]
And if a muslim guy did it he would be labeled a 'terrorist'
[/flame bait]

good night :D
 
Not once have i feel the need to bring up you ethnicity or religion, but i guuess you need something to fall back on.

well its the reason why you're jumping to conclusions and getting butt hurt over an off topic comment - the massive chip on your shoulder re: anything that could potentially be regarded as negative towards muslims...

Though just to humour you... another poster made a comment (and edited it slightly after I quoted it) on the first page mentioning that usually Sikhs were polite and it must be annoying for Sikhs to be mistaken for Islamic extremists. I then quoted it (that's an indication that I was replying to his comment, not to the subject of the thread in general) and mentioned that "most Sikhs I know aren't exactly big fans of Muslims in the first place "... i.e. it would be extra annoying to be mistaken for an Islamic Extremist in that case.

you've then picked up on this and decided that I obviously meant all sikhs or that it was related to the murdered sikhs etc.. I'll have to remind you that this is GD not SC (so the odd off topic remark, comment should be expected) and that it was quite obviously a brief comment, quoting another brief comment, slightly off topic, made by another poster. Despite several explanations you've repeatedly decided to kick up a fuss and try to find something to moan about... essentially just because its related to muslims.
 
Last edited:
Hmm well black on white hate crimes rarely get media attention it wouldn't shock me if such things happen they probably do in South Africa.

Because usually they are just crimes, rather than hate crimes or hate murders. Anyhow cant see your point in reference to this thread were a known white supremacist has butchered foreigners simply because of that fact.
 
Haha dailymail / you win :D

Whelp unless the daily mail has recently hired an excellent new team of lawyers they still can't get away with changing what judges say yet.

But please if you're this inept at separating source and content feel free to read any other publication of the case.
 
yup

[flame bait]
And if a muslim guy did it he would be labeled a 'terrorist'
[/flame bait]

good night :D

Like this guy has been labled a "white terrorist" :cool:

well its the reason why you're jumping to conclusions and getting butt hurt over an off topic comment - the massive chip on your shoulder re: anything that could potentially be regarded as negative towards muslims...

You can only conclude from the comments made, which you have made clear for all to see. Anyhow this is getting boring now and you seem very childish claiming others are buthurt but clearly you dont like being challenged on your retarded comments, and have no way of defending them apart from retorting to bringing race and religion into you defence.
 
Whelp unless the daily mail has recently hired an excellent new team of lawyers they still can't get away with changing what judges say yet.

But please if you're this inept at separating source and content feel free to read any other publication of the case.

OK ill bite. I stated

And if for example of black panther member drove down to his local "white church" and shot everyone im sure he would be labled a "black supremacist" or some variant

And you post a story about a bunch of drunk muslim girls attacking a white girl is contary to what i stated or relevant..how? Were these girls members of Alqaeda? A failure of the justice system is just that a failure of the justice system. Was it treated as a race crime or not? if it wasnt then take it up with the judge...
 
You can only conclude from the comments made, which you have made clear for all to see. Anyhow this is getting boring now and you seem very childish claiming others are buthurt but clearly you dont like being challenged on your retarded comments, and have no way of defending them apart from retorting to bringing race and religion into you defence.

no way of defending them? I retorted by clarifying initially that I wasn't referring to all Sikhs... which you then ignored and decided to carry on as though I hadn't attempted to clarify anything for you. chip on shoulder....

I've brought religion into it because you've then turned this into a 2 page off topic argument by repeated taking issue with the comment... your motivation seems to be purely because you're an oversensitive Muslim who picks up on anything remotely to do with Islam and gets into an argument over it. IIRC you did a similar thing in the circumcision thread.
 
no way of defending them? I retorted by clarifying initially that I wasn't referring to all Sikhs... which you then ignored and decided to carry on as though I hadn't attempted to clarify anything for you. chip on shoulder....

I've brought religion into it because you've then turned this into a 2 page off topic argument by repeated taking issue with the comment... your motivation seems to be purely because you're an oversensitive Muslim who picks up on anything remotely to do with Islam and gets into an argument over it. IIRC you did a similar thing in the circumcision thread.

I did not ignore it, i even stated earlier something along the lines of "since you all ready admited" etc. Come on keep up with it.

Yes youve done it a again, whats that now 7x :D

Since where all full of assumtions im going to assume your a Nazi, with a chip on his shoulder because there are too many "ethnics" in this country *

* I dont believe this but since where making assumptions.

Edit: Youve turned this into a 2 page argument since you bought up the irrelavent India/Pakistan conflict over Kashmir. With the fact, Sikh's having very little to do with the regional conflict considering they only make up 1.9% of the Indian population, then went on hypocritically to ask me to only post conflicts with Buddhists and Christian in the UK ONLY where yourself bring stuff up from Asia.
 
Last edited:
I did not ignore it, i even stated earlier something along the lines of "since you all ready admited" etc. Come on keep up with it.

you did chose to ignore the earlier explanations for the comment because you're still carrying on... perhaps you just failed to understand or perhaps you still want to take offence just for the sake of it, have an argument over nothing because you like to troll the forums whenever any mention of muslims are made which you could attempt to interpret as something you could take offence to.

Edit: Youve turned this into a 2 page argument since you bought up the irrelavent India/Pakistan conflict over Kashmir.

no I made a comment about Sikhs I know, you then made an assumption and brought up Sikhs around the world...

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=22509146&postcount=44

in the context of Sikh/Muslim relations world wide do you not think Kashmir is kind of relevant, at least from the Sikh perspective?

With the fact, Sikh's having very little to do with the regional conflict considering they only make up 1.9% of the Indian population,

proportional makeup is not really relevant... where is the world largest Sikh population? Oh yeah over 2/3rds of Sikhs around the world live in India... so since you decided to mention Sikhs around the world in the context of whether or not Sikhs and Muslims get on well I'd say the sectarian violence in that region is kind of relevant since it affects, in some way or another, the vast majority of them...

Do all Sikhs dislike Muslims - of course not. Do the vast majority of Sikhs dislike Muslims... not necessarily. Do some Sikhs dislike Muslims - erm no **** of course some of them do... its quite commonplace within some communities.

So why exactly are you getting so oversensitive about a comment I made about Sikhs that I know?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom