• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

XFX 7950 DD Ghost or are they..?

They are all Alloy which is nice no plastic. Tbh in my case you will never see them so looks is not overly important to me. But I think they look awesome and they are really well built.
Yeah I just think they look awful, personal preference I guess. The side view is quite smart.

That teamed with XFX's CS makes them a no go for me.
 
Yeah I just think they look awful, personal preference I guess. The side view is quite smart.

That teamed with XFX's CS makes them a no go for me.

I have not dealt with XFX before they do have a lifetime warranty hopefully I will not need to use it. For £188 each I think they are a bargain.
 
These cards clock very well although when you up the voltage they do get quite loud.

I have 1250/1700 now and the temps remain under 75.c but they do get a tad loud.
 
I don't buy into this Asic rubbish. one of mine is 73% and the other is 81% and the 73% card clocks slightly better. It is supposed to be the other way round....
 
How you finding these now you've had a chance to play with them?

Fantastic. Running them at 900/1375 and BF3 never drops below 60fps at max settings. They will clock quite a bit higher but ingame I cannot tell the difference so settled for 900/1375 on stock volts to keep the temps and noise down.
 
I don't buy into this Asic rubbish. one of mine is 73% and the other is 81% and the 73% card clocks slightly better. It is supposed to be the other way round....

The way I read it is the cards with higher asic quality over clock better at a lower voltage and ideal for air cooling with lower voltage, but the cards with the lower asic quality respond better to higher voltage and are better for water cooling etc. As you have good cooling, your lower quality card will reach higher heights :)

Or it could be complete ****** :o
 
Fantastic. Running them at 900/1375 and BF3 never drops below 60fps at max settings. They will clock quite a bit higher but ingame I cannot tell the difference so settled for 900/1375 on stock volts to keep the temps and noise down.

Have you pushed these yet ?

Rustys thread got my interest with the difference at high res between
680's and 7950,due to the price and your opinion of them I fancy giving crossfire a whirl.

Thinking about it, might be worth doing my own thread on this.
 
Have you pushed these yet ?

Rustys thread got my interest with the difference at high res between
680's and 7950,due to the price and your opinion of them I fancy giving crossfire a whirl.

Thinking about it, might be worth doing my own thread on this.

Yes they run 1250/1700. Although other than benchmarks I see no real noticeable ingame difference between this and 900/1375.
 
It's been a fun week with these cards but they are either going to be sold or returned. I have just accepted a new job and need a few bits to start me off inc a laptop.

It's a shame and once things are sorted work wise I will likely buy another pair as they are superb...
 
It's been a fun week with these cards but they are either going to be sold or returned. I have just accepted a new job and need a few bits to start me off inc a laptop.

It's a shame and once things are sorted work wise I will likely buy another pair as they are superb...

Get ones that are not voltage restricted. ;)
 
Well just had some good news. It lloks like the RAF will cover most off my costs in setting myself up as part of my resettlement.

Hopefully will find out tomorrow if so the cards are staying....:D

Happy days.
 
The way I read it is the cards with higher asic quality over clock better at a lower voltage and ideal for air cooling with lower voltage, but the cards with the lower asic quality respond better to higher voltage and are better for water cooling etc. As you have good cooling, your lower quality card will reach higher heights :)

Or it could be complete ****** :o

Yeah I think it is a load of wombat crap myself, but from what I can work out the voltage seems to have most input with the formula to calculate the asic quality.
Sort of stating the obvious that a lower core voltage has more headroom so therefore higher overclock potential (so higher asic etc).

My 7950 TF3 has under 70% asic but clocks wonderfully well so I have to say asic means diddly for me.


@ Moogleys did you play with the memory voltage to hit 1700?
 
Last edited:
The way I read it is the cards with higher asic quality over clock better at a lower voltage and ideal for air cooling with lower voltage, but the cards with the lower asic quality respond better to higher voltage and are better for water cooling etc. As you have good cooling, your lower quality card will reach higher heights :)

Or it could be complete ****** :o

Spot on. Its not a load of crap.

However if you don't get lucky on the silicone then you're out of luck.
 
The ASIC quality is what AMD apply to each chip made to determine its power requirements. The card vendors then use this to determine which version of card the chip will go into.

This is what I read but it still seems random to what number you get and has no real effect on overclocking.
 
Spot on. Its not a load of crap.

However if you don't get lucky on the silicone then you're out of luck.

We are going by simply what W1zzard (the author of GPU-Z) has presented. I presume his sources are good, but only NVIDIA, ATI, TSMC, or one of the board partners (EVGA, MSI, etc) could tell us exactly how to quantify it. I know we have a few students on this forum going through engineering courses for microprocessor design. Not sure if their classes discuss a concept like this at fabrication or not.

More or less what Ryu said. We don't *know* anything, W1zzard found a register with some interesting data in it, made a quick percentage conversion, and put it up for what it's worth. Everything beyond that at this point is guesswork. Some of it's very educated guesswork, and we can partially test and validate it by comparing, but only Nvidia knows what Nvidia means by it, and same for AMD. I wouldn't even expect a flat statement of it's purpose from Nvidia to match precisely with AMD's interpretation of how it should be used.

Ok Matt, you know what you are talking about ;)

http://techreport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=79775
 
Back
Top Bottom