• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

OMG I love my new Nivdia 680

Status
Not open for further replies.
I got 2215 ish on a 1250/1700 run I think. Way too hot and loud to run 24/7 though :)

Nice! I reckon my cooler could deal with that. Wanna swap cards? :D

Very good score for a 7950. The best I had seen before was MilanChris with around 2150 or something. Certainly great cards for the money and a wiser buy for multi screens.

Especially if you're a lucky sod like Rusty :mad:

Thats why its the slowest GTX 680 its only half a GTX 690 running with SLI disabled.

lol
 
It was faulty. I have no problems posting opinions it's just the spinning of them as facts which I take issue with.

Other than poor or no SLi performance I have never had a problem with a non-faulty nVidia card in any game or application.

FACT.

Was written carefully. It is 100% accurate.

Notice the word 'I'

and no I haven't tried every game and application.

The fact I had a faulty ATi card does not change the statement above in the slightest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sort of in the other camp really, don't get e wrong my 670 is fantastic for games but its complete gash in autocad and sketchup (architecture work). It's worse than the 5870 it replaced.
 
I'll agree that nvidia feels a lot smoother I went from 7970 C.F. to 670sli and even though benched lower felt a lot smoother multi gpu and and just don't work, but with nvidia I just slotted in a third and no messing instant extra performance just selecting tri sli and away you go for this nvidia is worth the premium to me.

Just my 2 cents as I have used both sides this gen in multi gpu config's
 
Other than poor or no SLi performance I have never had a problem with a non-faulty nVidia card in any game or application.

FACT.

Other than the 3 faulty 570's I got and the zero faulty AMD cards I got I have never had a problem with a card in any game or application.

FACT.

You cant just splurge tripe about your personal experiences and pass it off as fact, I'm the 3rd or 4th person to say it but it's not sinkin in with you.

BOTH SIDES HAVE SIMILAR FAIL RATES!!! Get over it
 
Other than the 3 faulty 570's I got and the zero faulty AMD cards I got I have never had a problem with a card in any game or application.

FACT.

You cant just splurge tripe about your personal experiences and pass it off as fact, I'm the 3rd or 4th person to say it but it's not sinkin in with you.

BOTH SIDES HAVE SIMILAR FAIL RATES!!! Get over it


Hold on!!!!!

Yes he can.

What has he said that isn't a FACT. He hasn't said that nobody will ever get any problems, he has just said that he hasn't had any problems.

What is the matter with people, if I say my house has a red door and this is a fact, I'm not saying that every house on the planet has a red door just that my house has. That is all he said and people are shouting him down for it.
 
Have you actually read the original offending remark bru? No.

I agree with LtMatt now - it's getting a bit boring now.

Yes I have.

How can a card that costs more and performs worse be better?

That was the comment I received, on numerous occasions.

nVidia cards work all the time, I have never had a problem with any of them since moving from Windows XP and that was only dodgy SLI driver support after W7 had come out.

Yes you can get a 'faulty' card but that's true with both ATI and nVidia.

There do seem to be a hell of a lot of faulty MSi HD 7950s though.


This was his original comment that you seemed to have an issue with.

Wrong. That's your experience but don't pass it off as general fact. nVidia cards don't work all the time neither do AMD cards work all the time. The failure rate (bar a dodgy batch from a partner) are similar.

If you're going to post bias remarks then at least state that your comments are bias rather than trying to pass them off as fact.



Yeah - definitely a bad batch there. One of mine was also faulty.

He didn't state that anything was a fact at all he was giving was his personal experiences.

Which he emphasised with his next comment.

Other than poor or no SLi performance I have never had a problem with a non-faulty nVidia card in any game or application.

FACT.

notice the BOLD capital "I"


from there it has just been the usual slanging match that happens all the time on forums across the world.

Have you actually read the original offending remark bru? No.

It would be like if I said, how dare you state as fact that I didn't read the original statement. which of course is not what you actually said at all.




(Disclaimer this entire post is my own opinion except for the quoted comments by other parties shamelessly copied without their permission :D)
 
And the funny thing is its all on default settings. No oc at all:)

Its not really a stock gtx680 though. Reviews have said at stock the superclocked boost clock can often be over 1200+ mhz not the 1124 mhz stated. Most gtx680's will boost a good bit higher than what the tin says.

Once you overclock it, i am sure you will be even more impressed.
 
If you read his other posts you would know what the undertone to them is never mind this part which you have quoted but then ignored its meaning:

How can a card that costs more and performs worse be better?

That was the comment I received, on numerous occasions.

nVidia cards work all the time

You're correct in that he does then go on to say that it is his experience but the post is basically saying buy a worse performing nVidia card on paper and it'll be better because they work all the time.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom