And I think you missed the mark with reason hate EA, they don't hate them because they try and make money they hate them because of the way they do it (a reputation built over years).
To elaborate a little the main points:
- Excessive Micro-charges, e.g. Disc locked content, Day One DLC, additional charge for multiplayer in second hand games
- Treating their customers like criminals e.g. DRM, if you dont use your origin account within 2 years you lose all your games (its deleted), a game ban results in a ban on your account (bye bye games)
- Buying out quality studios and gutting them e.g. Bullfrog, Westwood studios, Pandemic, Zynga
Yes, and let's compare each of these points in turn to Valve's:
- Continual support for games with free DLC, look at how many updates TF and L4D1/2 series got. Edit: valve also has the steamplay program, where if you buy a mac or windows version of a game in this program, you get the other for free. I expect with Linux being developed, they'll do the same with that.
- Steam is a form of DRM, but it's DRM done right, because it actually adds value. All the community features, the in-game overlay, automatic patching, ease of transporting your games from one pc to another or surviving windows reinstalls, etc.
- Where EA buys out quality studios then works them into the ground then discards them, Valve has actively supported indie games and smaller studios, both in marketing (sales making people aware of titles they never would have known about or considered buying), and as a publisher (providing a distribution platform that allows devs to get most of the profit for the games).
There are plenty of good reasons why people might like Valve over EA, and it comes down to the radically different philosophy these companies have that underlie every decision they make.
Last edited: