Will God accept you if you renounce religion?

It's very difficult to debate with people who are only educated to secondary school standard. They think they know everything. Secondary schools teach everything in Science as fact which is very misleading, and as a result we have lots of atheist bigots who think they know about the world we live in when in actuality they know nothing.
 
Jason2 said:
Because you stated that mavity draws matter to all other matter, which isn't the case with atoms.
Click to expand...

You really have next to no understanding of this at all do you, I'm not sure why you described yourself as educated as this is GCSE stuff. Atoms have a gravitational field directly related to the mass of the atom.
 
m4rk84 said:
You really have next to no understanding of this at all do you, I'm not sure why you described yourself as educated as this is GCSE stuff. Atoms have a gravitational field directly related to the mass of the atom.
Click to expand...

Again, if mavity is a force that causes all matter to be attracted to all other matter, why are atoms mostly empty space inside?
 
Jason2 said:
Again, if mavity is a force that causes all matter to be attracted to all other matter, why are atoms mostly empty space inside?
Click to expand...

How does the amount of empty space matter at all? Aslong as some atoms have more mass then others then the theory holds true. The amount of empty space is irrelevant.
 
Jason2 said:
It's very difficult to debate with people who are only educated to secondary school standard. They think they know everything. Secondary schools teach everything in Science as fact which is very misleading, and as a result we have lots of atheist bigots who think they know about the world we live in when in actuality they know nothing.
Click to expand...

Not really, but they are intelligent enough to see when the wool is getting pulled over their eyes.

Just because someone is more educated in say one topic does not mean they know all the answers.
 
Jason2 said:
It's very difficult to debate with people who are only educated to secondary school standard. They think they know everything. Secondary schools teach everything in Science as fact which is very misleading, and as a result we have lots of atheist bigots who think they know about the world we live in when in actuality they know nothing.
Click to expand...

That really is just a condescending and insulting assumption to make. Seriously, please step down from your high horse.

I appreciate some people who've taken their handbags out have somewhat depreciated the thread, but there really is no need to look down upon those you deem yourself to have had a better education than based on an assumption, which you have little/no evidence to support.
 
Jason2 said:
It's very difficult to debate with people who are only educated to secondary school standard. They think they know everything. Secondary schools teach everything in Science as fact which is very misleading, and as a result we have lots of atheist bigots who think they know about the world we live in when in actuality they know nothing.
Click to expand...

I have a degree in Political science. I am as educated as you. I have shown you studies which show time and time again the trend that atheists are smarter than theists.

Stop confusing your privileged upbringing with intelligence as I pointed out before in the posts you chose to ignore.
 
Jason2 said:
It's very difficult to debate with people who are only educated to secondary school standard. They think they know everything. Secondary schools teach everything in Science as fact which is very misleading, and as a result we have lots of atheist bigots who think they know about the world we live in when in actuality they know nothing.
Click to expand...

Some of the people you are debating with have far more education than you given them credit for. Including myself, I don't think a show and tell on relevant and comparative qualifications is really a valid way to express ones opinion, particularly in a thread that has run its course.
 
I've just realised something; Oxy must have meant "denounce" instead of "renounce". The entire premise of this thread was founded on his poor grasp of semantics!
 
Castiel said:
Some of the people you are debating with have far more education than you given them credit for. Including myself, I don't think a show and tell on relevant and comparative qualifications is really a valid way to express ones opinion, particularly in a thread that has run its course.
Click to expand...

I'm not doubting that mate, but when you have people personally insulting you then it's not so easy to remain calm.
 
ringo747 said:
That doesn't give me any evidence for supporting the belief that there is no God.

Is it fair of me to conclude that hurfdurf believes there is no God without ANY supporting evidence?
Click to expand...

I can't speak for Hurf, but I believe he's saying that until he sees evidence for god, there's no reason to say it can actually exist. Although, he does confuse me as to how he can say for certain there is no god :confused:
 
For those who say "there is no God", then yes you do have to bring evidence to the table. You are making a statement. If you don't think there is a God, then it should be "I don't believe there is a God". Then you are not making a statement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom