Magnolia's sweet shop : a strategy game of confectionery

Shayper said:
Hmm. The best way to see for yourself is to do the test I mentioned. I will be testing the lollies as and when the shipment arrives.
Click to expand...

While I have no doubt that your test will occur with flying colours, i'm afraid my knowledge in the area is limited and if the result is actually harmful.

I presume you will provide the test subje...sorry, specimens so we can test your claims of it being dangerous to our consumers?
 
Sudden said:
While I have no doubt that your test will occur with flying colours, i'm afraid my knowledge in the area is limited and if the result is actually harmful.

I presume you will provide the test subje...sorry, specimens so we can test your claims of it being dangerous to our consumers?
Click to expand...

It would be preferable for Sin Chase to procure these, as accusations against me to that effect would unfortunately render my position untenable.
 
I can assure you of the authenticity of the cherry laces, the shipment was direct from the manufacturer and included a certificate of authenticity and will stand up to the most stringent testing.

With regards the lollies, the issue is down to a hurriedly sourced supply, it maybe they are slightly older than desired but having sampled one I didn't notice any such issue with stick.

I would suggest this shayper character has perhaps sabotaged the consignment in an attempt to gain favour and create an opening for himself within your organisation. Background checks on him from my end suggests he's actually an agent for the Confectionery Undercover National Taskforce. We have pictures of him wearing a beany hat inside, what more evidence is needed, safe to say I don't like the cut of his gibb.

Lollies can be procured for 4 SW, any lower and I'm cutting my own throat
 
Judgeneo said:
Dear sir,
As an online only business (under a domain name you don't own) your business is particuarly at risk to cyber threats.
I can offer full penetration testing and consultancy services with regards to information risk. Such services would help guarantee the long term success of your business.
My rates are negotiable, but I an only able to accept payment in fudge for tax reasons

Kind regards,
Judgeneo
Click to expand...

[FnG]magnolia;23437316 said:
If you can get me the www.magnoliasweetshop.com domain name and can perform the required testing and various consultancy services which a high profile online confectionery presence demands then I can provide fudge.
Click to expand...


Excellent, I am in the process of acquiring the requested domain name but competition from a third party means this may take longer than anticipated.

Preliminary searches through your computer systems revealed an easy entry point for an attacker (now fixed). Furthermore it appears that custom malware has been placed in your systems that have been monitoring your email communications, balance sheets and stock counts. This malware has now been removed, but damage has already been done. Due to the sophisticated nature of this attack I am unable to ascertain the identity of the attacker, but I can confirm they are from the Nottingham area of the UK.
 
Last edited:
LOAM said:
I can assure you of the authenticity of the cherry laces, the shipment was direct from the manufacturer and included a certificate of authenticity and will stand up to the most stringent testing.

With regards the lollies, the issue is down to a hurriedly sourced supply, it maybe they are slightly older than desired but having sampled one I didn't notice any such issue with stick.

I would suggest this shayper character has perhaps sabotaged the consignment in an attempt to gain favour and create an opening for himself within your organisation. Background checks on him from my end suggests he's actually an agent for the Confectionery Undercover National Taskforce. We have pictures of him wearing a beany hat inside, what more evidence is needed, safe to say I don't like the cut of his gibb.

Lollies can be procured for 4 SW, any lower and I'm cutting my own throat
Click to expand...

You would say that. I can assure the authenticity of my claims. As for your background checks, especially note the part that says Ex-Member. Where do you think I found your details?
 
Memo from : LOAM
Recipient : Magnolia
cc: Sudden & Moses
bcc : removed

Please find enclosed photos from our investigation, our methods of acquiring them was secure. We believe the software running is showing phone tapping or audio monitoring of you. Further more we believe the Confectionary Undercover National Taskforce have employed the service's of triplets to enable this agent to be in several places at once thus providing failsafe alibis.

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=23413554&postcount=5891
 
Last edited:
Hardly evidence. Whilst I was working legitimately for the aforementioned task force, my cover was a DJ. Your lack of knowledge only affirms my suspicions that you are, in fact, working for Chris Beans.
 
Chris beans was simply one of many customers we supply. Our relationship is nothing more than that of vendor / purchaser.

I however note your admission of connections to the Confectionery Undercover National Taskforce and this confirms our alarming suspicions.
 
Last edited:
Judgeneo said:
Excellent, I am in the process of acquiring the requested domain name but competition from a third party means this may take longer than anticipated.

Preliminary searches through your computer systems revealed an easy entry point for an attacker (now fixed). Furthermore it appears that custom malware has been placed in your systems that have been monitoring your email communications, balance sheets and stock counts. This malware has now been removed, but damage has already been done. Due to the sophisticated nature of this attack I am unable to ascertain the identity of the attacker, but I can confirm they are from the Nottingham area of the UK.
Click to expand...

Legally privileged and confidential
You are evidently well versed in technical matters. Could you please employ these skills in discretely looking into this Shayper character to see if LOAM's claims hold merit. I would like to err on the side of the caution but having a sweetie chemist is obviously a big plus.
 
Mr loam, we are still happy to accept your shipment of lollies, but given the nature of the sticks I am forced to stay at 3 SW as my final offer. We are currently in the process of recruiting a manufacturing team to produce our own goods, so I suggest you accept this.

We have run our own checks on Mr shayper via Sudden and Moses, and we believe their work is beyond reproach and therefore must side with him in this matter.

I'm sure Mr Magnolia will agree that any further disagreements on the matter should be addressed to our legal team, and that this slander can only harm each of our reputations when conducted in this manner.
 
memo:
recipient: sudden and Moses

On behalf of Mr Magnolia, thank you for looking further into this matter. Although we believe Mr shayper to be of sound integrity, we certainly appreciate your diligence.

Kind regards
Sir Devrij
 
Sudden said:
Legally privileged and confidential
You are evidently well versed in technical matters. Could you please employ these skills in discretely looking into this Shayper character to see if LOAM's claims hold merit. I would like to err on the side of the caution but having a sweetie chemist is obviously a big plus.
Click to expand...

The image in question shows a musical recording of approximately 110bpm, the media play records on Mr Magnolias system indicate that Justin Timberlakes "Cry me a river" has been played on repeat for the past 4 days. This means that any recording from the shop site would have a beat of around 125-130bpm. I can therefore say with certainty that the recording is not of Mr Magnolia or anyone at location of the sweet shop.

It has also come to my attention that the location of Mr LOAM is in the Nottingham area of the UK, suspiciously close to the origin of the cyber attack launched against us.
 
Judgeneo said:
The image in question shows a musical recording of approximately 110bpm, the media play records on Mr Magnolias system indicate that Justin Timberlakes "Cry me a river" has been played on repeat for the past 4 days. This means that any recording from the shop site would have a beat of around 125-130bpm. I can therefore say with certainty that the recording is not of Mr Magnolia or anyone at location of the sweet shop.

It has also come to my attention that the location of Mr LOAM is in the Nottingham area of the UK, suspiciously close to the origin of the cyber attack launched against us.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the quick work! Could you also do a subtle background check on Shayper to see about his involvement in this task force?
 
It will flag up that I'm an ex member. I left due to overwhelming corruption, and have since been working on my own investigations into the bribery scandals that rocked the task force. Chris and Loam popped up multiple times.
 
My location of course shows as Nottingham as that is our base of operations. Sadly due to the nature of my organisations business we simply can't have dealing with a company that employs known members of the Confectionery Undercover National Taskforce, ex or not.

As is the unfortunate nature of the confectionery trade Mr Shayper can expect a visit from Colin the Bull. Make of that what you will.

Finally I would like to thank you for the cucumber sandwiches, they were scrumptious.
 
(as an aside to this thread, I have to say I love that acronym LOAM :D)

So, you don't want dealings with n ex member? What do you have to hide from another legitimate business?
 
LOAM said:
My location of course shows as Nottingham as that is our base of operations. Sadly due to the nature of my organisations business we simply can't have dealing with a company that employs known members of the Confectionery Undercover National Taskforce, ex or not.

As is the unfortunate nature of the confectionery trade Mr Shayper can expect a visit from Colin the Bull. Make of that what you will.

Finally I would like to thank you for the cucumber sandwiches, they were scrumptious.
Click to expand...

You dare besmirch the name of Magnolia's Sweets and threaten our staff? Sir, you have provided some goods that our expert deems to be of sub standard quality, even going so far as to eat some of those goods which we had ordered.

You must understand that I do not take this lightly. I am, however, a businessman, and where there is good business I am prepared to be tolerant. As such, if you provide us with quality goods in future dealings I see no reason to cease our relationship. I have enjoyed our meetings so far, and it's always nice to go to the Ritz on occasion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom