Auto though, so a bit less desirable than a 2.8 manual which in general will command more. I still think both were well pretty good buys mind you.
yep, true
Auto though, so a bit less desirable than a 2.8 manual which in general will command more. I still think both were well pretty good buys mind you.
If I remember rightly you are the guy I helped get the Clio 200 at a good price? I think we had almost identical specs as well?
I sold my Clio 200 to a local Renaultsport dealer back in May and got a fantastic price for it. While I'm not suggesting you definitely will, it's worth checking as you may find you'll get more than the GFV at the end of the contract. They will pay the finance company for you and you pocket the difference. Worth checking![]()
[TW]Fox;23512173 said:in Coupe form, sure, but in Roadster form it would appear to have inherited many of it's non-M stablemates shortcomings.
That said one thing the Z3 did offer that nothing else did for similar money was a big capacity 6 pot in a small Roadster. The MX5 is a better handling car for sure but as a powerful (200bhp in 1996 isnt bad) cruiser the Z3 2.8 had some appeal.
that's me![]()
Can't complain at all for a grand, but I wouldn't be seen dead in a Z3
Have you actually had a brain injury?![]()