• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Geforce Titan rumours.

Frenzy said:
Yeah I've been looking at the oculus rift. This has me really excited, probably my most anticipated gadget ever. I love the fact that they have carmack and gabe onboard. It means it will get REAL support.
Click to expand...

yup, got one on pre order for april
 
Oh man I want one of these in my shuttle so bad. Someone donate me the extra £500 I would need. I will send you pictures and everything...
 
Lord_ZED said:
but thats just development kit without fancy optics :(
Click to expand...

it's the dev kit ye, it has everything including the optics though, not the universal ones that will allow glasses and non glasses wearers to use it the same sure....but i don't wear glasses so i'm good
 
only reason i did not get one.
Glasses wearer friendly helm is product seller for me and my room mate.
 
1000x2000px-LL-0106e6db_LL.jpg


Triple screen is where Titan is aimed and you can now see why :)
 
You can't break the graph up like that - SLI scaling over multple cards results in diminishing returns for each extra card in most cases.
 
gregster said:
I hope it is true and it does look like an Nvidia slide.... Thursday will confirm.
Click to expand...

It would be nice if it was true but as an AMD owner who actually prefers Nvidia,I have seen both teams fudge too many of these graphs to pay any attention until we have all done real world benchmarks with them.
 
oldestgregg said:
It would be nice if it was true but as an AMD owner who actually prefers Nvidia,I have seen both teams fudge too many of these graphs to pay any attention until we have all done real world benchmarks with them.
Click to expand...

Look closer, those "lines" have been added ontop of the graph and not very well either, the graph was originally from nvidia I believe but those paint-like lines sure as hell didn't.
 
gregster said:
I only use here as an example as we are not allowed to mention competitors and as I have bought every computer part except 2 waterblocks from OcUK since 2008, I felt it was relevant.

I am putting it in perspective to justify my purchase and it isn't personal or digging at AMD.

AMD have the 7950 for the guys who want top performance for 1080P and CF for multi screen gaming but what about Tri-Fire and Tri-SLI? Do they scale well?

This is why I am getting Titans. I know 2 will cope nicely because SLI/CF is supported nicely but tri isn't... If it was, I would be all over 3*4GB 680's but you know as well as me that support for tri is abysmal.

As I am a 3 screen 3D gamer, you tell me what I should do to get the best results? Come to think of it, let anyone advise me what to do to get the best results because I can't see anything out that will manage with this setup except Titans.
Click to expand...

I am not having a dig at you about getting Titan or its improvements,however,all the complaining about the HD7900 series original pricing was a bit OTT IMHO at the time it was launched. Like I said they were expensive,but at the time it was pretty much GTX580 level pricing,and it seemed no one was complaining about high GTX580 level pricing. It was all AMD's fault,etc whilst people were obviously still spending good money on GTX580 cards. It takes two to tango.
 
Last edited:
Weren't the complaints because of the 7 series sub par performance which didn't match the price? This has obviously changed now with new drivers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom