A small crack in my windscreen

Are you holding an air rifle in the windscreen reflection? That would explain the shattered screen lol!
Did you shoot your car?

But seriously, that screen is a write off, and dangerous.
 
Are we looking at different pictures? Dangerous?

Unless I am missing something I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. It's not even an MOT failure currently is it?

One day it might spread but until it does whats the big deal?
 
I can see spider cracks from the epicentre of the damage, they appear to spread outside of the photo aperture. If I'm seeing what I think I'm seeing, then yes it is most definately an MOT failure it is a stuctural piece of safety glass. Hairline cracks in glass are really thin.

Unless driving about with a windscreen that is well beyond repair is perfectly acceptable?
 
I can see spider cracks from the epicentre of the damage, they appear to spread outside of the photo aperture. If I'm seeing what I think I'm seeing, then yes it is most definately an MOT failure it is a stuctural piece of safety glass.

Could you show me which part of the MOT test it would fail?

Whilst sitting in the driver's seat and, referring to the diagram below, examine the driver's view of the road through the swept area of the windscreen.

There is no reference to damage to the screen which is not visible from the drivers seat. The damage on this windscreen hasn't encouraged onto the clear section of glass even.

I'm not saying I wouldn't replace it - I would - but I'm also not seeing the critical safety issue people here seem to see leading many to suggest he doesn't drive the car?

It'll get worse - and when it does, it becomes a more serious issue but currently I can't see what the problem is by the fact its unsightly and liable to grow in size?
 
And for those saying it cannot be fixed You are wrong. The moisture is sucked out of the cracks & impact point & then it's filled with a very strong resin. The cracks would be barely visible after & the impact point would just be a small blemish in the screen.
And before you say it, The Insurance companys are quite happy with these repairs & pay for them under your screen cover.
 
[TW]Fox;23971176 said:
Could you show me which part of the MOT test it would fail?

http://www.transportoffice.gov.uk/c...nualsandguides/mottestingmanualsandguides.htm

Class V, Windscreen;

Reasons for rejection:

A. The presence of an object which seriously restricts the driver's view of the road ahead, bearing in mind the original design of the vehicle

B. any crack, surface damage or iscolouration which seriously restricts the driver's view of the road to the front or side

It would depend on the tester, but I suspect most would fail it as I think the guidelines are or at least were 40mm outwith zone A.
 
http://www.transportoffice.gov.uk/c...nualsandguides/mottestingmanualsandguides.htm

Class V, Windscreen;

Reasons for rejection:

A. The presence of an object which seriously restricts the driver's view of the road ahead, bearing in mind the original design of the vehicle

B. any crack, surface damage or iscolouration which seriously restricts the driver's view of the road to the front or side

It would depend on the tester, but I suspect most would fail it as I think the guidelines are or at least were 40mm outwith zone A.

How can it possibly seriously restrict the drivers view of the road?!

It's on the black opaque section of the screen!
 
And for those saying it cannot be fixed You are wrong. The moisture is sucked out of the cracks & impact point & then it's filled with a very strong resin. The cracks would be barely visible after & the impact point would just be a small blemish in the screen.
And before you say it, The Insurance companys are quite happy with these repairs & pay for them under your screen cover.

I suppose, I've always went for new glass it's much more satisfying and very clear when new. No scratches or repair marks \o/
 
[TW]Fox;23971224 said:
How can it possibly seriously restrict the drivers view of the road?!

It's on the black opaque section of the screen!

It clearly stretches out beyond the edging!

It would depend on how far out it goes, and how it looks from the inside. Cracks can be very deceptive, and in strong sunlight can certain cause disctraction and some testers are stricter than others.

There should be more detailed regulation come guidance I'll try to find it.
 
It clearly stretches out beyond the edging!

Please tell me you are not looking at the dark mark? That's a reflection from the telegraph pole in the background :p

None of the 'cracks' radiating from the impact point extend into the clear section of the windscreen. They are very faint anyway!
 
Last edited:
No Fox, that would be obvious back ground markings I'm talking about the lines coming away from the chipped area, look closely;


28427494.jpg


41929458.jpg


They are faint but it depends how far they travel into the clear area. If they don't, it won't take long.
 
Oh, wrong bit! Reading again, there is no mention of structural integrity of the screen at all?? Just that you can see through it in a certain area...
 
I cannot see any of the cracks extending into the clear area.

Even if they did they are insufficient in size to obstruct view of the road anyway. I cannot see how this is an MOT failure.
 
jesus 4 pages of arguing over a bloody cracked windscreen..

Class IV (cars)
Opaque edging on a windscreen (usually black, particularly at the lower edge) found on some modern vehicles is not to be regarded as part of the windscreen when assessing the drivers view through the windscreen within 8.3 Item 1 of the Inspection Manual.

Windscreen Inspection Zone

Zone 'A is:
The swept area of the Windscreen, 290mm wide centred on the centre of the steering wheel.

Reason for rejection
1. In Zone 'A:
a. damage not contained within a10mm diameter circle,

c. a combination of minor damage areas which seriously restricts the driver's view

In the remainder of the swept area:
d. damage not contained within a 40mm diameter circle,

Further more
Repaired windscreens must be inspected to the same test criteria as unrepaired windscreens.
Repairs must be judged solely on the basis of whether they interfere with vision. An ‘invisible’ or barely detectable repair, finished flush with the surrounding glass, does not count as damage even if it exceeds the limit on damage allowed in the test.
If these criteria are met, the position and size of repairs is not relevant for the purposes of the test.

OP, just drive the bloody thing and get it replaced if it gets worse.
 
Last edited:
1 page!

Where did you get that? I thought it was 10/40mm.

Thing is, we can't see off the edge of the photo that's the point. I'd like to see a repair effort on it though.
 
4 pages here. when at work and 3G is shockingly **** I don't want to have to download a massive page..

and it is 10/40mm I just said that.
10mm when it's inside Zone A and 40mm when outside ( but still within swept area)
Straight from testers manual
 
Back
Top Bottom