Silly bint gets free boobs on the NHS

'glamour model'

only if they shoot from the neck down, and even then, not everyone likes plastic

At least the boobs take the attention off that god awful face

I suppose they take the emphasis off that god awful face.

EDIT: BEATEN!

That face.

Looks like she needs a facelift on top of that.

That's a face for a blunt instrument.

I was going to say she could do with a face job.... but then I paused.... and thought I best not.

The cost of a face job to get her good looking would bankrupt Bill Gates.

dat face !!!!!!
at least the boobs take the eyes of her face

I think I'd be better at applying makeup.

her face reminds me of these

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=tr...w=1680&bih=898

Two things:

One, they quote an expert from BAAPS.

Two, if the boob job cost is smaller than the NHS resources she would have wasted trying to otherwise solve her problem, then the taxpayer wins surely?

Still, her face was the real priority.

Seen the topless pic? They look horrible, and she needs a paper bag.

Why even bother with a face like that.

Should've spent the money on her face really.

If she thinks anyone's going to pay her to model she is sadly mistaken.

Suppose it diverts attention away from her face.

Shovel to the face would have made her pretty.
Click to expand...

Everyone one of those (just a scan from the first three pages) = going for a laugh
 
Jono8 said:
Again, wrong.
Click to expand...
Why don't you ask them then?

"Regarding your comment on how ugly her face was, was this:
1. Ironic
2. Satirical
3. Playing to the gallery
4. Tongue in cheek
5. Part of your cleverly constructed online persona to hide your sensitive side
6. You knew Jono would find your hip and edgy humour amusing.
7. A projection of your awesome Alpha side to your peers.
8. You thought she was a cheap ugly slapper ripping off the NHS and wanted to say as much..."


Of course it is bound to be 1-7, option 8 is so far fetched as to be laughable, right Jono? ;)

So your solution is for no one on this forum to ever be allowed to say anything bad about someone elses appearance?
Click to expand...
I'm not allowed to call you smelly, I'm not allowed to call a black person anything at all, I'm not allowed to call a Muslim anything at all. I can however call a Christian whatever I like and I can post whatever personal abuse I care to about a girl who is not here to defend herself.
Do these inequities not seem strange to you?

In real life it isn't really done to comment on people's appearance, if they want to go on the Internet and do exactly that from behind the anonymity of their keyboard then they are what makes the Internet a crappy place to be.

Hm, i think that perhaps highlights your lack of understanding on how a lot of people project themselves on this forum.
Click to expand...
A bunch of blokes doth not a comedy club make. Sorry about that.


Again, surely this discussion is over?
You think "I wouldn't shag that stupid ugly slapper with a bag on her head" is intentionally funny and worthy of repetition by another 30 posters all looking to abuse her more than the last guy.
I find that kind of posting embarrassingly boorish and reflecting badly on the forum.

The PC mods clearly agree with you, you defacto win the debate, I have films to watch :)
 
I'm on your side of the fence bitslice but to be honest the things that have been said to her on Facebook and Twitter are 1000x worse than anything said on here and she has said she only looks at the nice comments and isn't bothered by the nasty comments.
 
bitslice said:
Why don't you ask them then?

"Regarding your comment on how ugly her face was, was this:
1. Ironic
2. Satirical
3. Playing to the gallery
4. Tongue in cheek
5. Part of your cleverly constructed online persona to hide your sensitive side
6. You knew Jono would find your hip and edgy humour amusing.
7. A projection of your awesome Alpha side to your peers.
8. You thought she was a cheap ugly slapper ripping off the NHS and wanted to say as much..."
Click to expand...

I would if i could be bothered and i would say most answers would be 3,4 and 7. (Also, re no.6, i have never said that i have found all the comments amusing, a few had made me smile, in the same way the Clarkson joke about disfigured people did...)

Also, what is wrong with number 8 if that is what people genuinely feel? Yes, it isn't pretty ( and neither is she....sorry, had to :p) but i would rather we had a forum where people could say what they think than have everything censored.

bitslice said:
I'm not allowed to call you smelly,
Click to expand...

You can call me smelly as much as you wish.

bitslice said:
I'm not allowed to call a black person anything at all, I'm not allowed to call a Muslim anything at all. I can however call a Christian whatever I like and I can post whatever personal abuse I care to about a girl who is not here to defend herself.
Do these inequities not seem strange to you?
Click to expand...

Yes, i agree. Political correctness is stupid and doesn't make sense. I don't what our ability to speak freely eroded even more though.

bitslice said:
In real life it isn't really done to comment on people's appearance, if they want to go on the Internet and do exactly that from behind the anonymity of their keyboard then they are what makes the Internet a crappy place to be.
Click to expand...

Is that the internet? Or just people in general? Have you never been with friends or a group of people and within that group someone had made a negative comment on someones appearance? Can you whole-heartedly say you have never commented negatively on someones appearance to your friends or family behind someones back?

bitslice said:
A bunch of blokes doth not a comedy club make. Sorry about that.
Click to expand...

No, but you can at least let people try to be funny. ;)


bitslice said:
Again, surely this discussion is over?
You think "I wouldn't shag that stupid ugly slapper with a bag on her head" is intentionally funny and worthy of repetition by another 30 posters all looking to abuse her more than the last guy.
I find that kind of posting embarrassingly boorish and reflecting badly on the forum.
Click to expand...

yes, i do think that particular comment will have been written with the intention to make people laugh.

bitslice said:
The PC mods clearly agree with you, you defacto win the debate, I have films to watch :)
Click to expand...

I don't think we are going to see eye to eye on this so yes, go watch some films :p
 
Earning £9k/year in a call centre as a single mum of two children, she was already a burden on the tax payer. Objectively, if she somehow lands a better job through this (increased confidence and self-belief?) it could actually cost the taxpayer less money than leaving her as she was.

Not saying it's right, but it's hardly the worst waste of taxpayer money ever.
 
satchef1 said:
Earning £9k/year in a call centre as a single mum of two children, she was already a burden on the tax payer. Objectively, if she somehow lands a better job through this (increased confidence and self-belief?) it could actually cost the taxpayer less money than leaving her as she was.

Not saying it's right, but it's hardly the worst waste of taxpayer money ever.
Click to expand...

The boobs will have to be replaced in 10 years.

Her chosen career has an extremely limited lifespan.

It would be nice though.
 
OptimaLnrg said:
Just saw the topless pics

How can they spend 5k on that? the incision isn't even the new method around the nipple ROFL. This is what I meant when I said getting the NHS to do them at all was a mistake.

NHS = tesco value.

edit: Just noticed she's northern. What a package. Dodgy boobs and a rough northern accent. Probably necks lager like a lad too. Do not want.
Click to expand...

The NHS doing the bare minimum in this case is a good thing, they look terrible and will put people off I think. The good thing is that I'm sure the NHS surgeons put in more of an effort for genuine patients such as those who've had their breasts removed due to cancer.
 
Balddog said:
The boobs will have to be replaced in 10 years.

Her chosen career has an extremely limited lifespan.

It would be nice though.
Click to expand...

I'm amazed how some women would want to do such things. Look at the celebrities, all the botox and that. Yet they seem to get worse with the bigger lips. As if age is such a bad thing.

 
Has the "I wouldn't have minded so much if it had been - Silly bint gets three boobs on the NHS" joke been done yet?

And since I am a tax payer, when is it my turn to have a go on them? Is there some sort of order form?
 
PiKe said:
Hahahahahaha.

'I regret my £5,000 NHS boobs and now I want them reduced ... for free'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...regrets-5-000-NHS-boob-job-wants-reduced.html
Click to expand...

Please stop reading the daily mail. They have almost certainly paid her to create this story.

CoxGMfy.jpg
 
PiKe said:
Hahahahahaha.

'I regret my £5,000 NHS boobs and now I want them reduced ... for free'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...regrets-5-000-NHS-boob-job-wants-reduced.html
Click to expand...

She now says "36DD breasts are stopping her getting work", not to be nasty, but i don't think its her over-sized breasts that are stopping her from getting work, you seen that face that she is wearing, Glamour is not what springs to mind, more like Jeremy Kyle :)

Edit - Her facebook page HERE talks of holidays to Portugal and £1000 payments from Maxim Magazine, plus photo shoots for Nuts Magazine, so in my opinion she should get no further surgery for free !
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom