BUT saying the iPhone integrates with little hassle is not a 'feature' to iPhones, both android and windows do the same thing, and in some cases better, but people know about what they have not things they do not which is obviously understandable.
I think this says it all
![]()
There's no way I'd have a desktop PC in my living room instead of my iMac.
I see what you mean. My lack of clarity is probably due to be desperately trying not to use the term “eco system”, which I despise with a passion. What I mean is that I already have an Apple TV and a MacBook pro, which the iPhone integrates beautifully with. This is worth a lot to me, but if you don’t have these devices or use they the way I do it may not be to you. I agree there is a strong element of intrenchness (can’t think of a better word), I just don’t want to learn how to use a new system. This can be a good and a bad thing for companies. While it can drive sales, if a tipping point is reached it can also decimated them as people move on to the next greatest thing.
The only thing I think we can be certain about is that in “x” years Apple will not be top dog, someone will have over taken them. Maybe Apple will then come back, maybe not. Companies move up and down the food chain, just look at Sony. In the end I don’t care. All I want is good products and a price I think is worth it. This cycle drives innovation and pushes prices down (for a set feature set), which is good for the consumer. I think I’m starting to sound like a right wing free market evangelist, so I’ll shut up now.
There's no way I'd have a desktop PC in my living room instead of my iMac.

And again the cycle repeats.
I believe it's to do with the quality a speed of the memory (I'm no expert). This is not a problem with imbedded memory, but rather expansion through SD slots. Cheap and sometimes poor quality cards can result in a drop in performance (or so the wise interweb tells me), I can say I've experienced this with cameras.
You can view this in two ways:
1) Apple wants to guarantee the quality of the user experience and prevent reputation damage by apps performing poorly due to poor expansion cards.
2) They are just using it to increase profit.
In reality it's probably a mix of the two. With the consumer being left to make the choice (along with many other factors) as to whether this is a benefit or restriction that they are happy with.
Why not buy a 20 something inch retina for a gaming tower if you are so bothered about having an ornament in your living room?
I think you missed my point. The living room is a space shared with my wife and it's decorated as such. An iMac doesn't look as offensive as a tower case + screen + wires, it's also very quiet with a small foot print on the small desk. I'm by no means a fan boy, this is my first mac, I work in IT and use my Windows laptop all day.These are the reasons people dont like apple fans with silly comments like that![]()
I think you missed my point. The living room is a space shared with my wife and it's decorated as such. An iMac doesn't look as offensive as a tower case + screen + wires, it's also very quiet with a small foot print on the small desk. I'm by no means a fan boy, this is my first mac, I work in IT and use my Windows laptop all day.
I didn't 'just' buy it because it looks the way it does, but it does fit my needs.

Well yes there are even cheaper phones with better features so this backs up my point further. At least I made the effort to prove my points. I agree the Iphone is well made and looks nice but does this justify the huge price premium? ... I think NO MICRO SD on a £530 phone is just bad.
Well people can be defend apple all day and say the prices are due to components being matched but I think the screen shot I posted sums it up nicely.
I put a £35 8gb upgrade kit in my mbp nearly 2 years ago and have had no problems at all. People will soon catch on, and laptop/desktop manufacturers will start to build equally attractive hardware at a reasonable price and that's when apple will start to fall.
Some have started with the laptop clones but are charging similar prices and they obviously have win7/8 on there so at the moment they are not really competitive. It will happen though, just like it did with the iPhone.
[/COLOR]
I’m afraid I don’t agree with you, the purchasing process is much more complex than you make out, which I believe you are fully attributing to ignorance on behalf of the purchaser?
From the shot you posted up Apple are asking £160 for an upgrade, which can be purchased for £40 ish elsewhere and self-installed? So for £120 a person upgrading with Apple:
1) Does not need to open up their expensive new toy. Remember despite this being quite easy, most people would not be prepared to do it.
2) A guarantee that the memory will work, if it does not Apple will resolve it
3) A fully encompassing guarantee. No issues about warranty if there is a problem as the whole system was sourced from Apple.
4) And the absolute biggy (in my case anyway), time. In most cases the time will be minimal, but many people just don’t want to take the risk and want a nice simple approach. Apple then capitalise on this and charge a hefty premium.
5) Lazyness. It’s also a biggy. In many ways it is probably the deciding factor, we are by our nature lazy creatures. All companies exploit this. We know it and they know it. It’s almost an unwritten contract between our unconscious selves and companies.
To me that is worth a premium. Apple have always charged significant premiums for memory upgrades, I don’t see why this is ever going to change? It’s their business model and it seems to be working. They will eventually fall from grace (I say this as all companies eventually do), but I doubt it’ll be due to such a minor and longstanding issue. The biggest risk to me is a rival “system” reaching critical mass. I don’t count Android at the moment as I get the impression it is still very fragmented. But the day will come and to be honest if anyone new how, the last place they would be is posting it on an internet forum. Nope, they’d be out making a hell of a lot of money.

Right I will give some more examples as I am bored and want to prove my point... Although I feel it is somewhat pointless and even if I make a PC for 5% of the price of an apple I will still have "ah but but but the case is better and it has a logo on it "
EXAMPLE 1
Samsung Galaxy S3 16gb (expandable) = £330
Apple Iphone 5s 16gb (not expandable) = £530
Samsung - More features, expandable memory etc etc. 60% of the price. Iphone - pretty case and logo.
EXAMPLE 2
Apple Imac - £1500
Same spec PC - custom built, delivered, better graphics, better screen, better CPU etc. - £1000
PC = better spec, faster, better screen etc. 66% of price. Imac = Pretty case and badge.
There are two more examples... Now that is 3 examples I have given which prove my point that with apple you are paying a high premium for basically a pretty case and a logo. I dont see what is so great about apple service as a 3 year warranty is an optional extra anyway. This is more than anyone else has been able to produce other than subjective comments and nit picking. I think I have pretty much had enough of this now.
I believe it's to do with the quality a speed of the memory (I'm no expert). This is not a problem with imbedded memory, but rather expansion through SD slots. Cheap and sometimes poor quality cards can result in a drop in performance (or so the wise interweb tells me), I can say I've experienced this with cameras.
You can view this in two ways:
1) Apple wants to guarantee the quality of the user experience and prevent reputation damage by apps performing poorly due to poor expansion cards.
2) They are just using it to increase profit.
In reality it's probably a mix of the two. With the consumer being left to make the choice (along with many other factors) as to whether this is a benefit or restriction that they are happy with.
I fear you're wasting your time with the well reasoned posts, the mindless hate is far too strong.![]()

You might be right. These little boxes of magic really do bring out strong emotions
Hopefully one thing eveyone can agree on is that we live in great times with regard to technology. In the smartphone world we have Samsung, LG, Apple and others all producing great phones. Some are better than other at certain things, but none are slouches. You only have to take a look back to what we were using 6 years ago so see the leaps that have been made. I'm quite excited about what is on the horizon next, thought I must admit I'm struggling to see what the next big leap will be.
Your right they do hold value better (One reason for me getting an iPhone 5, as do not plan to keep it for long)
*EDIT* Main reason for getting the iPhone 5, I had a note 2 and a galaxy tab 2 7" and seemed pointless having two large devices, so did a straight swap for the ip5
I was just suggesting the other guy uses the mac mini as a compare, as nearly £100 is a lot of money when you are spending sub £500.
But the holding value could change at any time, and would be a little crazy to factor that into a purchase.