Got raped by Steam

That sucks man, it's obviously Steam that's at fault. Hope Gabe/one of his assistants are able to help.

Never knew there was so much money in TF2 items lol, had the game before it was F2P and only played it once. Amazing the amount of crap some people will spend money on.
 
I had my account locked a few years back due to an unauthorized PayPal chargeback on a £5 game, never got it back so good luck.
 
Soon Valve with be the next EA. I'm surprised gamers don't vote them as Americas worst company with their ****** subscriber agreement, customer support and incident's like the OP, where innocent buyers get penalized.
 
If you got arrested by the police and they refused to say why would you call that fair?

He hasn't been arrested, his account hasn't been banned and he hasn't had the items confiscated he still owns them and can give them away if he wishes.
All that has happened is he has been stopped from trading. He gambled with a large amount of his own money and it's failed.
 
Hope this thread will atleast make others think twice about using this trading system. I know i'll not bother ever looking at it.
Hope you get some actual support from them op!
 
Put across an opinion and get called an idiot, really classy OcUK.

Next time you make an "opinion" you should start with facts and sound logic, not a hit and run post and then afterwards when someone calls you out on it.
Can you at least see you were wrong in assuming someone must know if it's stolen or not?
 
I suspect quite a few people either haven't read the post properly or don't understand what the steam trading is all about.

I think you should definitely contact someone higher up. It is obviously a mistake, there's no way in hell you could have known that the items you were receiving were, in fact stolen from an account that should have been secured. In reality, you should have been contacted first in order to work out what actually happened - But that cannot stand for every situation.

Hope you get your trading privileges back though, it'd be a right shame to lose that much considering you actually did nothing wrong.
 
I'm not saying there is a foolproof way or even a way to verify these people you are dealing with or the goods they are trading to you

He already said he hasn't got a clue.

He's just talking a nonsense about something he obviously didn't understand.
 
I thought in the frequently asked questions it says to only trade and accept gifts from people you really know (friends & family)?
 
Last edited:
Steam like any other company is trying to fight piracy but they are doing it stupidly. You can lose your account by receiving one dodgy gift. Only accept gifts from people you know.
 
Hope it gets sorted, and nice one OcUK for trying to help out. Some of the comments in this thread though, bloody hell, just go out and get 'I am an idiot' stamped across your forehead and that way people will be pre-warned when you open your mouth.
 
sorry i think you missed my post.

how are you to verify the items are not stolen?
That's what I said in my second post, I don't know of any way to do this.

Maybe I didn't explain myself well enough. What I'm trying to say is that he is unhappy with Valve's actions, but Valve told him that he had traded
stolen/hijacked items already.

At that point he had three options:
1) Continue to receive items with no way of verifying their legality.
2) Set up some system where he only traded with those deemed trustworthy in some fashion.
3) Stop receiving items and eventually stop trading.

He chose to go with number one, he took a risk and that risk (as it stands) did not pay off. As far as I'm aware it's not within the Steam user agreement to vet these trades as they are transacted between two private parties. Even if they were to offer some service to help with this as the OP rightly said if the account is hijacked Valve would only find out after the fact which does not solve anything.

The only sure fire way that Valve can stop the OP trading stolen items is to ban him from trading.

Can you at least see you were wrong in assuming someone must know if it's stolen or not?
I can see that you are wrong in thinking that I said that anywhere.

[TW]Fox;24112962 said:
Actually, in many cases it does. It's perhaps best you familiarise yourself with the law around handling stolen goods if you wish to quote it to support a point. There needs to be reasonable knowledge that the goods were stolen to be guilty of an offence.
Indeed, what I was more getting at is the fact that Valve already told him that he was dealing in stolen goods previously, after that point Valve and the law in the case of my example would still continue to investigate further, as in this case they have done.

I'm not trying to say that he would be arrested or go to jail for it, I specifically avoided saying that in my post just that the excuse alone is not absolution.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom