sorry i think you missed my post.
how are you to verify the items are not stolen?
That's what I said in my second post, I don't know of any way to do this.
Maybe I didn't explain myself well enough. What I'm trying to say is that he is unhappy with Valve's actions, but Valve told him that he had traded
stolen/hijacked items already.
At that point he had three options:
1) Continue to receive items with no way of verifying their legality.
2) Set up some system where he only traded with those deemed trustworthy in some fashion.
3) Stop receiving items and eventually stop trading.
He chose to go with number one, he took a risk and that risk (as it stands) did not pay off. As far as I'm aware it's not within the Steam user agreement to vet these trades as they are transacted between two private parties. Even if they were to offer some service to help with this as the OP rightly said if the account is hijacked Valve would only find out after the fact which does not solve anything.
The only sure fire way that Valve can stop the OP trading stolen items is to ban him from trading.
Can you at least see you were wrong in assuming someone must know if it's stolen or not?
I can see that you are wrong in thinking that I said that anywhere.
[TW]Fox;24112962 said:
Actually, in many cases it does. It's perhaps best you familiarise yourself with the law around handling stolen goods if you wish to quote it to support a point. There needs to be reasonable knowledge that the goods were stolen to be guilty of an offence.
Indeed, what I was more getting at is the fact that Valve already told him that he was dealing in stolen goods previously, after that point Valve and the law in the case of my example would still continue to investigate further, as in this case they have done.
I'm not trying to say that he would be arrested or go to jail for it, I specifically avoided saying that in my post just that the excuse alone is not absolution.